Gregory S. Taylor’s father has composed a remarkable slideshow featuring pictures of Gregory’s brother Cpl. Brian Taylor and other Marines of Fox Company, 2nd BN, 23rd Marines, during the invasion of Iraq. Gregory writes: “Many are wonderful; some are heart-breaking. A few are graphic. They are all compelling.”
They sure are. This is a personal favourite. Following are Gregory’s notes to other images in the collection, taken from February 21 to May 29:
• Brian's fire team. Brian is second from the left.
• Some Canadian they found.
• In their chemical-protective suits. (Brian on right).
• Brian's closest friend doing a procedure called selective de-masking. They were ordered to don their chemical-protective suits in preparation for an attack believed imminent. They can only wear the suits for so long -- one cannot eat in them (though one can drink). When they want to take them off, they "selectively de-mask": a volunteer breaks his seal while the rest watch from behind their masks to see if he dies.
• Brian's friends with the USMC flag with their Company motto (borrowed from Richard Marcinko) along the the flag's border: "Everybody has fun, nobody gets hurt."
• A few of those same Marines holding the flag a few days later, but now hurt.
• Brian sitting on the tailgate of a 7-ton truck. He told me he rode all the way to Baghdad from Kuwait on that tailgate and saw the whole bleeding country. His company is the only coalition infantry element of which he is aware that went in to battle without any armor.
• A Marine with a keen understanding of diplomacy.
• Funeral service for Brian's friend Sgt. Cawley.
• Sgt. Cawley's battlefield monument.
• Captured and corralled Fedayeen.
• This was the morning after they fought a four-hour firefight on this corner and slept on the roof there. During the fight, they were resupplied with ammunition and water several times but never had any artillery or air support (the circling F18s couldn't drop their munitions because the Marines were too close to their enemies). In this picture, Fox Co. is watching another company clear the compound where Fox Company's enemies were based the night before. They found no one living.
• This was taken by Brian during that firefight. The cars in the distance were filled with the corpses of would-be kamikazes.
• Brian at the end of that day. My favorite picture.
• Gives an idea of how they lived.
• Back at Camp Pendleton, me with Brian's son Keith on my shoulders, Brian's wife Shari with John and Jane.
• Brian holding his son John for the first time.
Writes Gregory: “What a thing.” Absolutely.
Iraqis numbering more than half than total of American servicemen who’ve died since May 1 have been killed overnight in a terrorist attack:
A car bomb detonated outside a sacred mosque in the southern Iraqi city of Najaf yesterday, with doctors reporting up to 82 people killed. Among the dead was Iraq's leading Shiite politician, Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer al-Hakim, a key preacher of moderation in the war-torn country.
Baqer al-Hakim foresaw, in a way, his own murder:
Minutes before the blast, he denounced again in his weekly sermon attacks on the coalition forces. He told worshippers that these were being carried out by Saddam loyalists and former Baathists.
And now they’re killing Iraqis. This conflict likely isn’t driven by a centrally controlled and nationalist-driven resistance; more probably it's driven by an Iraqi faction (assisted by maniac outsiders) who would kill their own. As Saddam Hussein did for decades.
Having learned nothing from recent events, Jacques Chirac and Dominique de Villepin want the UN to run the show in Iraq. (Why aren’t they demanding UN intervention in France?) Leave it to Mark Steyn to explain why UN control might not be such a good idea.
Jim Nolan is on a roll lately. In today’s Age he pulls Tariq Ali apart:
The UN, he tells us, is viewed by Iraqis as "one of Washington's more ruthless enforcers" since it supervised the sanctions that were directly responsible for the deaths of half a million Iraqi children.
This was the favourite whopper retailed by the Saddam propaganda machine. Of course we now know that the food-for-oil program was diverted into Saddam's oil-for-palaces program. The tragedy was all Saddam's own work. He cynically starved his own people to garner the kind of credulous support he still appears to enjoy from the likes of Ali.
The entire piece is valuable, so rather than further ruin by extract I’ll just quote the conclusion:
Tariq's hyperbole may have the quality of stale, old-fashioned Stalinism, but its confected indignation and moral humbug gives it a faintly amusing tone. May his self-important exaggerations now situate him where he richly deserves to be - the intellectual moral equivalent of that other famous Ali, Comical.
A number of US troops, thankfully small, were killed in the initial liberation of Iraq. A slightly greater number have been killed since, although, overall, the list of casualties remains lower than many expected. The Sydney Morning Herald’s Alan Ramsey thinks everybody should be shouting and screaming:
Australian political life reacted in silence this week as US military deaths in Iraq reached a melancholy milestone. On Tuesday morning a homemade bomb killed an American soldier north of Baghdad and wounded two others. His death, reported The New York Times, meant more US troops had now died keeping "the peace" in Iraq than had died fighting "the war" ... I'm not aware a politician anywhere, state or federal, had anything to say about the significance of Tuesday's death. Most newspapers ignored it, too.
Old Alan’s main point, however, is the influence of those damn Heebs:
The only movement anywhere in the debate on Middle East policy is what Crean has been doing lately to try to mollify the influential (and wealthy) pro-Israeli lobby in Sydney and Melbourne. You don't know about that?
No, I don’t. Possibly because of the Zionist conspiracy to silence everything!
On Sunday night, at Melbourne's Werdiger Family Hall, Crean is due to speak "to the Jewish community" at a meeting organised by the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), the State Zionist Council of Victoria and the Jewish Community Council of Victoria, according to the weekly Australian Jewish News. The subject of Crean's address has been publicised as, "Israel's search for peace in the Middle East". (One Labor wit remarked that if this was truly the speech topic, then it would be a very brief speech.)
Har-de-har-har. Ramsey claims that any pro-Israeli sentiment from the Labor leader is money-driven:
Almost always, in politics, money is at the root of the greatest grovelling.
And we all know that the Jews have all the money. Crean has a few Palestinianoids in his party; Ramsey writes that shutting them up endangers Labor’s “even handed” policy, and concludes:
The pro-Israeli lobby in this country is a powerful, influential and intimidating group. Backbenchers such as Julia Irwin and Leo McLeay get left way behind, along with the interests of the Palestinians.
This is in a mainstream newspaper, by the way. Not Indymedia.
Poor Tim Dunlop has got his ducks all out alignment because terrorists have thanked him and his friends for the swell work they’ve done protesting against the war on terror:
Frankly, I don't don't give a toss what some murderer thinks of my opinions and I'm not particularly inclined to adjust my behaviour according whatever twisted logic such a sicko comes up with. I don't need to "bear in mind" anything terrorists say ...
Oh, really?
Patsy A. Newton asks questions and gets answers. Scroll down for the brilliant reply from She Who Will Never Be Mentioned, But Whose Name Rhymes With Embargo Cranston.
Gianna will be upset that her favourite baby name is already taken:
An Iraqi couple has named their 6-week-old baby boy George Bush to show their appreciation for U.S. efforts to force Saddam Hussein out of power.
"He saved us from Saddam and that's why we named our son after him," the baby's mother, Nadia Jergis Mohammed, told the Associated Press Television News. "It was George Bush who liberated us; without him it wouldn't have happened."
Baby Bush was born July 11 to Mohammed, 34, and her husband Abdul Kader Faris, 41. His full name is George Bush Abdul Kader Faris Abed El-Hussein.
If the couple had had twin boys, the father wanted to name the other baby Tony Blair, because he said both the U.S. and Britain liberated Iraq.
”John Howard” is still available.
The BBC’s credibility is floating in the Thames like a gangster’s corpse. But it’s inappropriate to say so:
The chairman of the BBC today accused British Prime Minister Tony Blair's officials of launching "inappropriate" attacks on the public broadcaster's credibility after it claimed that the case for war in Iraq had been hyped up.
We await the chairman’s instructions on a more appropriate method of responding to his organisation’s lies. A napkin folded at an aggressive angle? Interpretive dance? Boycotting the Crufts dog show?
Comments by Blair's close aide Alastair Campbell accusing the BBC of lying when it reported the government had "sexed up" a pre-war dossier on Iraq's weapons had been excessive, Gavyn Davies said.
And the original reports weren’t, Gavyn? At least Campbell’s comments are redeemed by being, you know, true.
"I felt this was an extraordinary moment, almost unprecedented, an unprecedented attack on the BBC to be mounted by the head of communications at Downing Street," Davies told a judicial inquiry into the death of government arms expert David Kelly.
Mounting a solid argument, isn’t he? So far we’ve had “inappropriate”, “excessive”, “extraordinary”, and “unprecedented”. The Blair regime is reeling.
"I took this as an attack on the integrity of the BBC and the impartiality of the BBC," said Davies, who heads the corporation's board of governors.
That’s one way to take it.
Cuba rocks so hard, according to Labour MP Brian Wilson:
Cuba's primary service to the world has been to provide living proof that it is possible to conquer poverty, disease and illiteracy in a country that was grossly over-familiar with all three. That is a pretty big service. The fact that it has been delivered in the face of sustained hostility from an obsessive neighbour makes it all the more stunning.
The fact that people keep trying to escape to that obsessive neighbour is even more more more stunning.
I have now had half a dozen such sessions with Castro. He talks a lot but then he has a lot to talk about. He is a man with an unquenchable thirst for ...
Murder? Torture? Brutality?
... knowledge.
Oh.
Cuba's problems are immense. Socialism in one country is still a contradiction in terms. For those who go to Havana only in order to sneer, there are political paradoxes on every street corner. All true, all the inevitable product of 40 years of siege, but also all irrelevant to the bigger picture of what Cuba represents as a symbol of human potential.
The potential for dumb tyranny in pursuit of a poisonous ideal. Yay Cuba.
The Age reports:
Melbourne researchers have successfully blocked in laboratory rats a gene believed to be a major regulator of hunger, causing the rats to eat less and lose weight.
They hope the process can be replicated in humans and become a treatment for obesity.
It could work. Compare the Melbourne rat to this mouse, which has been implanted with the Michael Moore gene.
Bizarre story in The Independent about Jerry Duggan, a young Brit who got mixed up with the LaRouche wing of the anti-war movement and ended up dead in Germany. Duggan’s final telephone call is especially intriguing.
My old boss Mark Day remembers Australian football legend Jack Dyer, a longtime columnist at the paper where I first worked, and a famously clumsy radio commentator:
It was unrehearsed and unconscious. And it was endearingly funny, although some folk in radio felt his rough edges should be knocked off. A voice tutor was hired to give him elocution lessons, which he rejected because "my full back got killed doing that". His former team-mate's day job was as an electrician.
Jack was never one to remember names. In 20 years of knowing him, I never made it past "son". If memory lapses made life a trifle difficult as a football caller, it was minor compared with the time Dyer was hauled into the witness box in a libel trial.
Truth also published an anonymous sporting column called The Count – a repository for all the goss no self-respecting reporter would put his (exclusively male in those days) name to. At issue in the court was the name of the author of The Count. Dyer, a former copper, took to the witness box and swore himself in, whereupon the plaintiff's QC cut straight to the point: "Mr Dyer, who is The Count?"
"Er, I dunno."
"How long have you worked at Truth?"
"Ten years."
"Well, you must know the people you work with."
"Yeah, well, there's the Pig, there's Mother, there's Mopsy, there's Bluey."
"Step down, Mr Dyer."
What a place to work. When I first joined the paper, in ‘88, many of the staff were banned at several local bars. For brawling. Amongst themselves.
Those inventive peaceniks and their fiendish tactics. First there were nude protests. Then they painted the Sydney Opera House. Later, human shields went to Iraq. Is it any wonder the peace movement so convincingly defeated pro-war voices in the battle for public opinion?
And they haven’t stopped yet. In fact, their latest ploy might be the most successful yet:
A man climbed onto the roof of the US Embassy in Paris today and threw copies of his pacifist poems to the ground before he was taken down by firefighters.
The man threw copies of a pacifist poem and a song that listed his name as Herve Couson. The writings did not mention the United States directly, but one had a photo of Couson holding a US flag. The song called for an end to "all these wars".
I give up. How do we counter this level of genius?
Michael Totten has some advice for anti-war protesters currently feeling sick after being thanked by Balinese terrorists:
You need to stand unflinchingly against terrorism everywhere, always, forever. This “of course we are against terrorism” line doesn’t cut it. At least one terrorist thinks he’s your buddy. He said it, not me.
When you reserve most of your judgement, criticism, and wrath for Western governments while speaking barely a word against Islamofascist death squads, it sends funny signals to our enemies. I know you don’t support terrorists and fascists. Well, when the victims are Jews it looks like some of you do.
But the rest of you don’t, and your message is not getting across. Louder, please. Draw a line in the sand.
Your domestic political opponents are not your enemies. Hamstringing America and defeating the Republican Party is not more important than defeating terrorism.
Your enemies are those who are trying to kill you. Make the proper distinctions. Get your priorities straight. Trust me, you don’t want to hear Osama bin Laden, or whoever is making those audio tapes, say he’s your pal. It could happen if you don't watch it.
Hey, some of them might welcome Osama’s friendship:
On Christmas Eve, in the Melbourne Age, another pundit, Michael Leunig, called for a national prayer for Osama bin Laden on Christmas Day. "It's a family day," Leunig explained, "and Osama's our relative." It is not recorded whether the aforesaid Osama, sitting cross-legged beside his Christmas tree somewhere under Afghanistan, offered up a prayer for Michael. He might have done: after all, they were on first-name terms.
Students at Cornell University pay anything between $14,000 and $29,000 per undergraduate unit. That’s a hell of a lot of money to have your brains sucked out through your nose:
Cynthia McKinney, Georgia's first African-American congresswoman, and John Pilger, investigative journalist, author and Emmy Award-winning documentary filmmaker, were appointed Frank H.T. Rhodes Class of '56 University Professors at Cornell in July. Their appointments run through 2006.
The Rhodes Class of '56 University Professorships, designed to enrich the undergraduate experience at the university, are awarded for a period of one to five years, and appointees are considered full members of the Cornell faculty. During each year of their appointment, Rhodes professors will visit the campus for a minimum of two weeks.
(Via TVs Henry, who currently has lots of fine posts up about well-known US politicians Cruz Bustamove and Howard Dean Stanton.)
Ken Layne's musical magic has arrived. I found it amongst the other mail yesterday afternoon, along with obviously fraudulent (and, as it turns out, dangerously flammable) demands from “telephone companies” and “electricity suppliers” and “lawyers”. The CD is excellent, and asks for no money. Here’s a track-by-track review:
1. The Apartment Manager
Hooky psychedelia draped over a beautiful, coasting keyboard line. “Should've listened to the apartment manager,” advises Ken. Words to live by.
2. She Thinks She’s Me
Extreem Country Honk-ish Rolling Stones with Whalen/Welch harmonies (“door, door, door, door!”) and the purest-of-pure Layne lyrics: “My God, I’m married to a freak.”
3. Come With Me
A child molester’s entreaty to join the circus. I think. Perfect scary clown music; whatever this collection lacks in technical prowess, it cannot be faulted -- as James Dickie once said of his poetry -- for originality of viewpoint.
4. Springtime in Budapest
Bleedingly pretty song of loneliness. And whores.
5. Like a Train
Features wonderful Kiko-era Los Lobos complexy drumming activity. There’s probably a word for this, but what do I know about music? Also lots of Exile.
6. The Monkey Cup
Layne and I once fought about this tune because it bears evidence of Nick Cave’s carcinogenic influence. I think I suggested it should be released in Australia as The Milo Cup, which Layne didn’t appreciate (or understand), leading to brief violence.
7. Worried
The single. Played it five times straight.
8. Another Sunday
This will evoke for sensitive people their own intense private regrets and amplify them terribly. Not being one of those people, I happily sang along like a retarded Ween brother.
9. Balloon Town
Layne loves the Big Echo. Who doesn’t? Could’ve been recorded in Sun Studios, assuming Sam Phillips was out buying amphetamines for Johnny Cash and forgot to lock the door, otherwise if he'd been around he would’ve killed lyrics like “cutest little two-headed freak”.
Six tracks to go! Just buy it now. Concluding reviews later. 10/10.
Emily Jones appreciates Arthur Miller’s fear of celebrity oppression:
Does anybody else recall their own trepidation following the "disappearance" of Maureen Dowd? What about when Noam Chomsky's limp body was discovered in a roadside brush, a single bullet to his temple? The country coiled in shock when it was announced that traces of arsenic were discovered in the empty box of Krispy-Kremes that ultimately killed Michael Moore. As this is written, a Dixie Chick sits in a dark cell, living on peckings, uncertain of her fate, while Janeane Garofalo hasn't been given the opportunity to co-star in a shit film since literally the start of the so-called "war on terror". When will the nightmare end?
It’ll end when the the likes of Miller are finally allowed to speak their mind to the global press. Oh, wait ...
Miranda Devine welcomes back the quagmirists:
Four months after the first US tanks rolled into Baghdad airport, the quagmirists are coming out to play again, having learned no lesson when their dire predictions about the second Gulf War proved to be as foolish as the triumphant pronouncements of Comical Ali, the hapless Iraqi information minister.
The "humanitarian catastrophe" with "hundreds of thousands of refugees" predicted by sainted Office of National Assessments whistleblower Andrew Wilkie never eventuated. The coalition troops were not "bogged down" by sandstorms. They didn't run out of food or ammunition. Their supply lines were not cut. They had enough troops to swat the fearsome Republican Guard. Australian soldiers did not come home in body bags. And those were flesh-and-blood Iraqis welcoming the Americans as liberators, toppling Saddam statues and slapping Saddam pictures with their sandals.
In the face of overwhelming proof of their fallibility the quagmirists retreated into sullen silence. But they seem now to have found their voice.
It's as if they never left.
Latest on the ABC’s Crittenden dispute, covered here earlier:
Several hundred ABC staff walked off the job for 90 minutes yesterday, vowing stronger action if suspended Radio National broadcaster Stephen Crittenden is not reinstated.
Meetings in Sydney and Melbourne also demanded that the ABC drop all action against Crittenden, apologise to him, and develop procedures to prevent the "arbitrary and capricious use" of editorial guidelines.
Next they’ll be protesting about bias. Yeah, right ...
Just a reminder: the Magnificent 19 Conference, to be held in London on September 11, is not a celebration. Oh, no no no. Whatever would give anyone that idea?
Anti-war protesters receive the recognition they deserve:
The man who helped mix the deadly one-tonne Bali nightclub bomb Sawad, alias Sardjiyo, yesterday said he wanted to thank the Australian people who had supported his cause during recent Australian anti-Gulf War protests.
And fellow bomb-mixer Abdul Ghoni urged Australians against forming friendly alliances with America.
The pronouncements of the two Bali bombing suspects came as they and the evidence against them was handed from Bali police to prosecutors.
"I want to thank the Australian people who supported our cause when they demonstrated against the policies of George Bush. Say thank you to all of them," Sawad said.
Consider it done, Abdul, old pal.
There are lots of disturbing elements in this Guardian story about an 11-year-old British boy who killed himself because he was tormented at school, but for me this is the most alarming:
In his final report, the headteacher of his primary school described Thomas as one of the most courageous boys he'd ever met because of the years of bullying he'd survived.
The headmaster knew. For years.
(Via Zsa Zsa.)
Another two occupying soldiers have been killed by resistance fighters. Incredibly, despite this obvious evidence of a looming quagmire, the government has dismissed the attack as an “isolated act by disaffected former rebels.”
At last ... Mars is within shooting range:
Tonight's the night for millions of stargazers throughout Australia and the world. Astronomical history will be made at 7.51pm when our neighbouring planet, Mars, makes its closest approach to Earth in 60,000 years. It will never be closer in our lifetime.
Via the Wog (now returned to zesty regular posting), one wild comments thread at Little Green Footballs. A fortune awaits the inventive!
Today’s editorial in The Australian:
If the terror attacks in India were the work of Muslim fundamentalists – as Indian officials have suggested, and as seems overwhelmingly likely – then they have underlined two of the signal features of Islamist terrorism, already apparent to us from the Bali bombing.
First, the attacks re-emphasise how indiscriminate these fanatics are in their hatred: you clearly do not have to be an affluent American, or even a Westerner, to qualify as a target for Islamist slaughter – poor struggling Indians will do just as nicely. And second, Monday's attacks show just how willing the terrorists are to accept the slaughter of fellow Muslims as "collateral damage" in their campaign to blast the world back into the Middle Ages. Of the 46 people killed and 150 wounded in the twin car bombings, at least a third were Muslims.
This week’s Continuing Crisis column for The Bulletin mentions Jim "Shakin" Bacon, Richard Butler, Mary Kostakidis, Katherine Prouty, Pauline Hanson, Natasha Stott Despoja, Brett Sutton, Sergio Vieira de Mello, Jane Hutcheon, George W. Bush, Bob Brown, Jacques Chirac, and Ray Bradbury.
(On Butler, Andrew Bolt says the loudmouth should already be fired from his new job as Tasmania’s governor, and Janet Albrechtsen writes that his appointment continues the Deanification of Australia.)
The Murphy Brown of Australian bloggers!
The UK Daily Mirror lists the biggest bloggers. In your face, John Pilger!
The tragic story of Peter L. Tauss, as revealed by the correspondence of Ray Smuckles:
July 23:
Confidential to the guy with explosive diarrhea: quit writing to me! I don’t care!
July 29:
Confidential to the guy with explosive diarrhea: I have contacted your email domain administrator and they are going to cancel your email account if you keep it up.
August 5:
Confidential to the guy with explosive diarrhea: very clever, just getting a new Hotmail account. I have added it to my “spam” blocker, so good luck getting through to me now.
August 12:
Confidential to the guy with explosive diarrhea: How in hell did you get my phone number?! It’s unlisted! Anyhow, I’m canceling the phone service to the house and just using my cell phone from now on.
August 19:
Confidential to the guy with explosive diarrhea: Thank you for the Hickory Farms gift basket, but I really do wish you would stop writing in. I gave the basket to a local homeless shelter, so don’t think I owe you anything.
August 26:
Dear Readers: I have some terrible news. I recently received word that “the guy with explosive diarrhea” has passed away. Apparently he had been suffering from undiagnosed chronic ulcerative colitis. If only I had taken him seriously, he would still be alive today. I feel absolutely awful about myself right now. Oh my lord, how he must have suffered, just to be shunned and ridiculed by the only one he thought he could count on.
Donations can be sent to the family of Peter L. Tauss, Norwalk, CT. Peter was fifteen years old when he died.
The ABC’s defenders claim that a public broadcaster is required to maintain freedom of speech. Commercial broadcasters, they argue, are constrained by financial issues, and may pull stories to appease advertisers. With no commercial concerns, the ABC is free to fearlessly discuss any issues.
Right?
Wrong. Ask Stephen Crittenden, host of the ABC’s Radio National Religion Report, who’s been stood down -- and could be fired -- because he expressed views to which the ABC objected. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:
Supporters of radio presenter Stephen Crittenden, who has been stood down as the host of Radio National's The Religion Report, have accused ABC management of seeking to suppress religious and cultural debate at the national broadcaster.
Crittenden faces dismissal at the end of the week unless he can convince management to overturn the findings of an internal investigation which found he had engaged in "serious misconduct".
The case involves an article written by Crittenden for the July 19-20 edition of The Sydney Morning Herald's Spectrum section, which examined Samuel P. Huntington's contentious 1996 book on growing Islamic unrest, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order.
In his piece, Crittenden wrote that "the Huntington thesis seems to have been remarkably prescient in the light of recent world events". That thesis, summarised in Huntingdon’s words: "The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power." Back to the SMH’s report:
The following week, the ABC's head of national talk radio, Mark Collier, suspended Crittenden, on the grounds the presenter had not secured permission to have the story published.
The Herald understands that Mr Collier had requested to see a copy of the story before granting permission for publication, on the grounds the topic was one of "extreme sensitivities".
Crittenden was waiting for that permission on the day the article was due to go to press, having previously forwarded it to Mr Collier.
Mr Collier and Crittenden were not commenting yesterday. The ABC's head of radio, Sue Howard, was unavailable for comment. The executive producer of religion radio, Florence Spurling, did not return the Herald's calls.
Why, it’s a regular free speech jamboree over at the ABC! Gerard Henderson (from whom the above thesis extract is lifted) rightly asks if the newspaper columns of ABC broadcaster Phillip Adams are subject to similar pre-publication review:
His columns invariably involve controversial criticisms - on sensitive issues - of the Howard Government and to a less frequent extent, the Opposition and its leader, Simon Crean. It would be interesting to note, say, where ABC management stands with regard to the Late Night Live presenter's comparison of the Prime Minister and the al-Qaeda operative David Hicks, and in particular, Adams's suggestion that "a stretch in Guantanamo Bay might be good for the PM".
The old perv apparently isn’t constrained by the same rules that imperil Crittenden. The ABC’s anxiety over Crittenden’s article is especially surprising given that Crittenden has previously discussed Huntingdon’s work on his own program. Perhaps nobody from management was listening.
ABC Watch has more on this, including that as of yesterday Crittenden has been suspended for five weeks without pay.
Five weeks? Why haven’t we heard about this on Media Watch -- broadcast, of course, on the ABC? One assumes they’ve heard about it; an ABC insider told me early yesterday a petition supporting Crittenden had been circulated throughout the corporation. ABC staff are now threatening to strike:
More than 50 ABC staff wrote to managing director Russell Balding yesterday to protest at Crittenden being stood down five weeks ago.
Several high-profile broadcasters - including ABC board member Ramona Koval, Geraldine Doogue, Robin Williams, Norman Swan, Peter Thompson and Chris Masters - signed the letter, saying they found Crittenden's treatment "perplexing and disturbing".
Has Media Watch host and free-speech advocate David Marr signed the letter?
A former religion editor for the ABC, Father Paul Collins, said that when he was a full-time ABC employee he had written opinionated newspaper articles and two controversial books. No one ever questioned him - in fact, he was encouraged.
He has written to Radio National general manager Mark Collier saying that if Crittenden was to be suspended, so should Phillip Adams and Terry Lane, who are high-profile broadcasters and newspaper columnists.
If Media Watch knew about the Crittenden dispute and declined to comment on it, shame on them.
And if they didn’t know about it ... same deal.
• EvilPundit continues the Indymedia roundup.
• Myongwatch! is back.
• TVs Henry notes that Al Franken has adopted the Michael Moore defence.
• Paul and Carl’s (and Habib’s) formerly-troubled site is now regularly loadable.
• And we have new blogs from Darren Kaplan and Chris Chittleborough. Go say hi.
Considering that Bombay changed its name to Mumbai in 1995, shouldn’t the devices that were detonated there earlier this week be referred to as “mumbs”?
That’s probably offensive to the families of the brave suicide mumbers. Whatever. To rescue this terrible post, here’s a line I just caught from Dennis Miller on an old clip from The View:
Other than the bombs they strap to their chests, I’ve got no idea what makes the Palestinians tick.
A happy morning in my old hometown:
A dispute between two fathers dropping off children at a Melbourne school today ended with one stabbed in the neck and the other under psychiatric observation.
At least one young child witnessed the aftermath of the incident as students entered their classrooms at Westgrove Primary School on Thames Boulevard, Werribee.
Back in my day, the knifefights happened inside the schoolyard. Where they belonged.
Is Iraq another Vietnam? Not exactly. In fact, it’s not even another Gulf War:
In Vietnam, for example, an average of 18 GIs died a day for more than seven years. During World War II, the rate was 221 combat deaths a day for four years. Even during the first Persian Gulf War, a 42-day blitz, America averaged about nine dead a day.
And a reminder to CNN: Kosovo wasn’t another Vietnam, either.
Daniel Pipes describes his Borking. Now that his appointment is secure, his opponents should prepare to be Piped.
It’s all over for the BBC and Andrew Gilligan:
The origin of the disputed 45-minute claim on Iraqi weapons came from a secret intelligence report dated August 30, the Hutton inquiry heard today.
The claim that Iraq could deploy "chemical and biological munitions" within 45 minutes was made in a classified email issued by a member of the joint intelligence committee (JIC) - but with both sender and recipient blacked out for security reasons.
It was distributed to Downing Street and Whitehall staff six days later on September 5 as new drafts of the September 24 dossier were being prepared.
The email stated that "forward deployed storage sites of chemical and biological munitions could be with military units and ready for firing within 45 minutes".
That revelation, presented on day nine of the inquiry by Sir John Scarlett, the chairman of the JIC, appears to blow out of the water the original suggestion by BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan that the claim was made up.
The BBC’s extorted subscribers should demand a refund.
UPDATE. If the Hutton Inquiry employed the mercy rule, this contest would have to be stopped:
Government intelligence chief Sir John Scarlett told the Hutton inquiry today he knew immediately that Andrew Gilligan's report on the Today programme alleging the dossier on Iraq weapons had been "sexed up" by Downing Street was "completely untrue".
The Moxie War has entered the crucial quagmire stage and is now officially Another Vietnam™. Thrill to the wild Treacher-Moxie action!
Meanwhile, in a non-quagmire conflict:
Hundreds of U.S. forces, backed by helicopters, tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles, launched a raid here Tuesday in a bid to capture the leader of a notorious gang wanted for attacks against U.S. forces and terrorizing Iraqi civilians.
Phillip Adams writes that people have “learned to live with the duplicitous and dishonourable. Scepticism may be healthy but cynicism like this is carcinogenic. It kills the body politic.”
Down with the duplicitous and dishonourable, as alliteration addict Adams might write. A curse on the cancer of cynicism! Not that Phil would ever stoop to such levels:
Recent polls show that legions of Americans still believe that Saddam Hussein and his secular Baath Party were in bed with al-Qa'ida, that Hussein was one of the architects of the September 11 attacks. Millions are convinced that those WMD were used against US troops as they moved towards Baghdad. And, moreover, that the weapons have been found.
Millions? The poll to which Adams cynically refers for his WMD claims was a one-off conducted in May, by the looks of things. It involved 1,256 people, or around 0.0004% of the US population. Other polls, which have more frequently addressed the WMD issue, record vastly different responses. CNN, for example, found in late June that 76% of Americans were either not confident or only somewhat confident that WMD would be located.
The headline on Adams’ column: “Poison of the 'I don't want to know' syndrome”.
Maybe it’s the tasty new McBove burger. Maybe it’s the Rude 'n' Surly salad range. Maybe it's the Hegemony Nuggets. Or maybe it’s just because the stores are air conditioned:
McDonald's is expanding faster in France than in any other country in Europe.
Jim Nolan on Andrew Wilkie, Australia’s logic-scrambled ex-intelligence official:
Now reaching the end of his Warholesque 15 minutes of fame, Wilkie is doing his best to extend his shelf life as a self-appointed whistleblower by resorting to fact-free allegations. Remember that he had weeks, if not months, of advance notice to prepare his submission to the parliamentary committee. This is a forum where submissions attract parliamentary privilege.
That Wilkie was unable to cite a single specific example to support his claims speaks volumes for his credibility. That he was so naive as to allow the wily Robert Ray to put words into his mouth – that the Government's claims were sexed up – says as much for his credulity. He willingly agreed with that characterisation without a single example and in the week when the same allegation against Tony Blair's spinmeister Alistair Campbell was nailed as a lie before the Hutton commission.
Few others have noted that it was a prompt from Ray that led to Wilkie's "sexed-up" comment. The Labor senator was obviously trying to sex up the inquiry.
CORRECTION. Jim Nolan writes to point out that the “sexed-up” prompt came from Liberal MP David Jull, who was likely being sarcastic. Which makes Wilkie’s eager acceptance of the term even more comical. Nolan has contacted Ray to acknowledge his error.
UPDATE UPDATE. Michelle Grattan has more:
One might almost have thought Jull was on Wilkie's side. He wasn't. This was a trap into which Wilkie willingly walked, repeating words he'd used about British material at an earlier British inquiry. The trap's purpose was to sharpen his accusation so it could be shot down more dramatically if the evidence of the assessments that went to the Government doesn't support it.
“Arnie's dark past haunts” reads the headline. However, as the story reveals ...
It's just a tiny typewritten line tucked away in an immense archive, but it sheds further light on the Nazi past of Arnold Schwarzenegger's father.
Arnie’s in the clear. Until it can be proven that Nazism is genetic.
Ferrari has won the last three world championships but drivers Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello are struggling this year to maintain the marque’s dominance. The Hungarian round of the Formula One championship has provoked this front-page response from La Repubblica:
We saw Barrichello losing the wheel and crashing as if he were driving a Trabant. And Schumacher paddling as if he were shipwrecked. They’ll tell us it was the tyres ... well, just go to the tyre man and change them. They’ll tell us others have made enormous progress but not why Ferrari are resembling a bus.
A partial translation is available here. Maybe Ferrari should hire Mark Webber.
Conservative columnists (including Mark Steyn) have left Canada’s National Post. Liberal Post columnist Elizabeth Nickson is delighted:
I don't regret the defection of the conservative boy prose stylists.
”Prose stylist” is a curious choice of insult to direct at writers. Nickson continues, comparing her former column pals to conservative politicians:
Just like the prose stylists of the former Post, they're boys. Only boys would miss the opportunity to form an effective opposition to the Liberal juggernaut. Only boys would make that bone-headed compromise on free trade. Only boys would insist on ideological purity and sacrifice Canada to their ego. Boys are not men. And boys do not deserve to lead.
Where the hell did this come from? Steyn doesn’t know:
No vendetta at my end. I’m devastated to discover, at the end of said column, that I’m not man enough for her. Liz is one of my favourite gal prose stylists and I was honoured to share a page with her.
And presumably relieved that nowadays he doesn’t. By the way, I wonder how far you’d get as a lefty columnist in Canada if you wrote that “girls do not deserve to lead”?
UPDATE. Several readers point out that Nickson is not, in fact, of the left. My mistake; I read here that she was “barking mad” and just assumed ...
Our society is collapsing. People are actually daring to talk about legal issues:
One of Victoria's most senior legal figures has accused Prime Minister John Howard and senior ministers of eroding public faith in the justice system by criticising Pauline Hanson's jail sentence.
Crown counsel Peter Sallmann said the spectacle of politicians publicly critiquing the outcome was damaging to the legal process.
"I find it quite extraordinary, and no less disturbing, that senior politicians, including the Prime Minister, Mr Howard, have been expressing views about the sentence," he wrote in a letter to The Age.
"Apart from the fact that these expressions of opinion from politicians seem so unnecessary and irrelevant, they are potentially damaging to the judicial branch of government and therefore to our system of government as a whole."
Extraordinary that The Age -- a newspaper, and thus nominally interested in freedom of speech -- should be so approving of Sallman’s anti-debate nonsense. Note the Tandberg cartoon in the linked article depicting a judge-menacing John Howard. What exactly were the seditious, society-smashing words the Prime Minister used?
But if you ask me - like many other people I find the sentence certainly very long and very severe.
And that’s about it. Trembly Sallman finds this “disturbing”. He should get out more often. In other Hanson news, Tony Abbott faces a PR crisis over his involvement in bringing down the One Nation leader -- although it’s interesting that the primary attack on Hanson came from the Right rather than the Left, which accused the government of not doing enough to stop Hanson’s rise -- and Bronwyn Bishop (obviously a Slatts reader) has described Pauline as a “political prisoner”. At the risk of futher destroying all trust in everything, Paul Sheehan calibrates the Hanson sentence:
... twice as heinous as armed robbery, three times worse than robbery with violence, and six times worse than child molesting.
His expressions of opinion seem unnecessary and irrelevant and are potentially damaging to the judicial branch of government. For the good of democracy, everybody please stop discussing stuff.
Tariq Ali is claiming some very precise Nostradamus-like abilities:
Contrary to the cocooned Iraqis who had been on the US payroll for far too long and told George Bush that US troops would be garlanded with flowers and given sweets, we warned that the occupation would lead to the harrying and killing of Western soldiers on a daily basis and would soon develop into a low-intensity guerilla war.
I haven’t Googled all of Tariq’s pre-war commentary -- who could? -- but I did turn up a few predictions before the vomiting became too intense. This is from last September:
There is growing anger and signs of unrest in every capital. There have been large demonstrations in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The region could erupt if the "war against terror" is extended to Iraq ...
A near-universal view is that if waged and won, far from being seen as a deterrence, it would greatly facilitate the growth of mass support for terrorist groups.
Hasn’t happened. And no mention of “killing Western soldiers on a daily basis, developing into a low-intensity guerilla war”, etc. Tariq the Future Teller had this to say in January:
I think, curiously enough, the war in Iraq and the occupation of Iraq and the substitution of Saddam with a U.S. puppet government, so the oil can be shared out as war trophy is bound to create resistance sooner or later. It may take four years. It may take ten years. We don’t know.
Except with hindsight. As late as April, with the initial phase of the war complete, Tariq’s crystal balls were still feeding him a “sooner or later” line with no specifics about daily soldier killings or low-intensity guerillas:
Sooner or later, the resistance will begin. My only hope is that it's a nationalist resistance, not a religious one.
Wish on, wishboy. The resistance -- such as it is -- “predicted” by Tariq Ali is hardly nationalistic, unless one imagines attacks on oil and water supplies to be the work of those supportive of Iraqi advancement. Enough foreign fighters are apparently present among the “resistance” to indicate at least some religious component.
Prove your predictive powers, Tariq. Tell us by how much Collingwood will win the 2003 Grand Final. And no fair supplying an answer in October.
Arnie will surely secure California’s bloc-voting tub activists.
A medical, if not social, breakthrough:
The patient had so far shown no signs of rejecting the new tongue.
Cathy Sherry shares an epiphany with Melbourne Age readers:
Think of a single house in the suburbs. A vendor cannot say: "I want $400,000 and won't accept a cent less." Not if he or she wants to sell. Ultimately, the price will be determined by how much a purchaser is willing and able to pay.
If the most a purchaser has is $300,000, that is all the house will realise. It will only sell for $400,000 if another purchaser has more money - thus it is purchasers, not vendors, who determine the price.
This discovery -- I call it “the Sherry Illumination” -- will revolutionise economics. Imagine; the amount a buyer is prepared to pay somehow influences the amount a seller is able to demand. Who knew?
Cathy continues with the revelations:
Stamp duty essentially represents the price of a new kitchen - on a property worth $150,000, stamp duty is about $5000; on a property worth $1 million, it is roughly $55,000. No matter how much or little you can afford to pay for a home, stamp duty is never going to make or break the deal. As economist Blair Warman commented in last week's Sunday Age, lowering stamp duty will just take money from the Government, put it in vendors' pockets and add fuel to the fire.
Sherry’s second theory -- that lowering taxes reduces the amount of tax a government receives -- is almost as staggering as her initial discovery (although here she must share credit with the genius Warman). Let us pray the government notices this breakthrough and increases stamp duty, lest “fuel” (ie, your money) be added to any “fire” (ie, stuff you want to buy).
Via Joe Dougherty we learn that Cybill Shepherd is deeply concerned over matters gubernatorial:
"That would be the worst tragedy in the history of California," Shepherd hyperventilated to "Access Hollywood."
"I think that we are the laughing stock of the world, with Arnold Schwarzenegger running [for] governor," Shepherd said. "I think he's a real hypocrite. I think he has a past that is going to come out, and I'm not going to mention what it is, but it's not going to be pretty."
Speaking of unpretty pasts, picture teenage Cyb and lusty Gray Davis engaged in some beachside saliva-trading:
Actress Cybill Shepherd told the San Francisco Chronicle that she and Davis "made out passionately" on a beach in Hawaii 36 years ago when she was 16 and he, 24.
Davis was working at a travel company at the time, and Shepherd was vacationing with her parents.
Shepherd said Davis had been a ''good kisser,'' but that they were never lovers.
The 52-year old actress says she is so upset about the recall election against Davis, she is thinking of holding a press conference.
That’s how upset she is.
(Thanks to reader John S. for the alert.)
List One features an inflatable goat, and List Two involves Uday and Qusay’s little-known Australian sibling -- Guday.
Mark Steyn on the blame America firsters:
As far as the world's press is concerned, the folks who are really to blame are the Americans. It's the Americans' fault because:
a) They made Iraq so insecure their own troops are getting picked off every day;
b) OK, fewer are being picked off than a few weeks back, but that's only because the Americans have made their own bases so secure that only soft targets like the UN are left;
c) OK, the UN's a soft target only because they turned down American protection, but the Americans should have had enough sense just to go ahead and install the concrete barriers and perimeter trenches anyway;
d) OK, if they'd done that, the beloved UN would have been further compromised by unduly close association with the hated Americans, which is probably what got them killed in the first place.
In other words, whatever happens, it's always evidence of American failure. That's the only ''root cause'' most of the West is interested in.
Meanwhile we stupid folk labor under the misapprehension that the terrorists might be to blame. Poor dumb us.
Excuse me, but wasn’t George W. Bush’s Texas meant to be the pollutiest place in the whole USA?
Turns out Texas is hands-down beaten for chokey air by liberal progressive California:
A national air pollution study found that Riverside, Calif., has the nation's worst air quality, with an average of 148 unhealthy air days a year.
The next four cities on the list were all in California: Fresno, Bakersfield, Los Angeles-Long Beach and Sacramento.
Strange thing about last night’s Collingwood-Swans game in Sydney: no mention was made of Jack Dyer's death. No mention that I heard, anyway. (Also strange: the Sydney players entered the arena to the hypergay beat of “It’s Raining Men”.)
Dyer was a great man from football’s toughest era. Consider just the spectators:
Once, after he knocked out an opposition player, 200 angry fans waited outside the ground to get at him. At that time Dyer was a policeman.
Emerging in his uniform he drew his revolver, made a break for his car and got away, although he was showered with stones and bottles.
Dyer’s whimsical, untutored commentary increased his fame in the decades following his retirement although, even by the standards of the 60s and 70s, he wasn’t exactly a polished media personality. On one edition of League Teams, the Thursday night football program he co-hosted with Bob Davis and Lou Richards, Dyer said nothing for the opening 15 minutes or so. He’d forgotten his false teeth.
A fearsome, bone-breaking player, off the field Dyer was as mild as could be. Well, usually. I met him a couple of times. Charming storyteller.
Lou Richards is right. Jack deserves a state funeral. I bet he gets one, too.
Short items:
•Not for nothing was he known as Lucky Lindy.
•Judging by this, PETA’s naked-chick-in-a-cage stunts have lost their crowd-pulling magic.
•Stephen Pollard reports that two-thirds of the e-mail he receives is insane:
That includes the usual anti-semitic rantings - my name, it seems, is not Pollard but Jew Boy - and the occasional rather implausible threat of violence ("We are coming to get you"). One fellow responded to a rant of mine against tennis - surely the most boring game ever invented? - with the almost sublime insult that "the only reason you hate tennis is because you are a fat bastard".
•Among the symptoms of computer virus infection: worm-turning headlines.
•And Ken Parish has written a fine essay on blogging, to which Bailz adds an important correction.
This week’s prize was all set to go to Zsolt Baumgartner, Hungary's first Formula One driver, until notification was received of a stunning 164km/h (100mph) effort from the daughter of Australian foreign minister Alexander Downer. Way to drive, ex-Sunday school teacher!
Dubya’s numbers are down. So are Arnie’s. But I don’t care.
The things you see when you don’t have a camera ...
This might turn out to be interesting:
Canadian police arrested 19 men last week in a case that, according to court documents obtained by a newspaper, has eerie parallels to the preparations for the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.
The Toronto Star newspaper said the men were arrested after a "pattern of suspicious behavior" which featured one man taking flight lessons that took him directly over an Ontario nuclear power plant.
Jacques Chirac says an uncaring French population is responsible for thousands of heat-wave deaths:
With critics accusing his Centre-Right Government of mishandling the crisis, he tried to shift blame for the high death rate on to French society as a whole.
Mr Chirac suggested many families and neighbours had gone on holiday and left the elderly to die.
"The tragic consequences of the heatwave show how necessary it is for our society to become more responsible and more attentive to others," he said.
So where was Jacques while French oldsters were dying all over the place? On holiday in Canada. Mark Steyn has more:
In Paris this spring, a government official explained to me how Europeans had created a more civilised society than America - socialised healthcare, shorter work weeks, more holidays. We've just seen where that leads: gran'ma turned away from the hospital to die in an airless apartment because junior's sur la plage. M Chirac's somewhat tetchy suggestion that his people should rethink their attitude to the elderly was well taken. But Big Government inevitably diminishes its citizens' capacity to take responsibility, to the point where even your dead mum is just one more inconvenience the state should do something about.
Currently kicking goals with both feet from impossible angles, as we Collingwood people like to say, are Sam Ward, the Bunyip, Bernard Slattery, EvilPundit, and Roger Bournival.
Someone should tell Robert Dessaix -- who believes that there is “no forum in Australian public life that allows for the open exchange of ideas” -- about this crazy new thing called the “internet”:
"The opinion column in our newspapers is not the answer. The columnists state their opinion, and that's that. I am talking about exchange," says Dessaix.
"The only thing we have that are genuine forums for such activity are our literary festivals."
Wank. Speaking of dinosaurs, Mark Latham needs to learn that if you’re aiming for a high-tech metaphor, it’s best not to use low-tech terminology:
By contrast, the new growth theorists argue that research and technological enhancement are the main drivers of growth. Instead of focussing on the accumulation of objects, economists need to focus on the accumulation of ideas. In particular, education and research are the 'twin-carburettors' of economic expansion.
And scientific advancement is the butterchurn of wealth creation.
Phillip Adams remembers the good old days when people were easily outraged by his vainglorious posturing:
One Sunday in the mid-’70s, the Vatican declared a fatwa on me. Priests in pulpits across Australia told their congregations that it was a sin to read any newspaper that published my columns – or to listen to any radio station that broadcast me.
Some fatwa. They didn’t even hack off a single limb.
Latest on the apparent inside job at Baghdad’s UN headquarters:
US investigators are interrogating two Iraqi guards they believe might have helped carry out the attack.
A senior US official said all security guards at the compound were agents of the Iraqi secret services. They had regularly reported on UN activities to the secret services before the war, and the UN continued to employ the guards after the war.
When investigators began questioning the guards, two of them claimed they were entitled to "diplomatic immunity" and refused to co-operate. The two were not entitled to immunity, the official said.
A UN official is telling much the same story:
Iraqi security guards at the UN's Baghdad headquarters aided the plotters of the suicide truck bombing which killed at least 23 people, a UN official said today.
"They clearly had support from Iraqi security guards inside who gave intelligence to the planners of the attack," the official said on condition of anonymity.
"It was a well-prepared attack. The target was Sergio Vieira de Mello, that much is clear," he said, referring to the top UN envoy in Iraq killed in Tuesday's bombing.
The attack was made easier by the UN itself:
After a bombing at the Jordanian Embassy last week, senior American officials warned that other soft targets might be next. But the United Nations deliberately avoided sealing itself off because it feared that such barriers would send the wrong message to Iraqis seeking help.
Clever. Whoever caused the blast, it wasn’t terrorism, according to the Sydney Morning Herald’s Paul McGeough. It was “resistance”:
It suits the White House to brand what is happening in Iraq as terrorism. It sits neatly with the now-discredited case that it used to justify war against Iraq.
The Herald is one of only a few news organisations to have interviewed members of the resistance. They made no pretence about the thousands of foreigners, all of them Arab, who have joined the fight. But they denied any active participation by al-Qaeda, Ansar al-Islam or Saddam Hussein.
They’re just happy little resistance fighters. Resisting peace. McGeough sounds almost admiring:
For all that, Washington still tries to include the attacks into its case against Saddam. In the face of recent evidence of a centrally controlled and nationalist-driven resistance, it continues to blame Baathist diehards and al-Qaeda and its associates. But it ignores the breadth and depth of this resistance at its peril.
Osama bin Laden's agents might well be in Iraq, but the range of the attacks is no different to those perpetrated over the years by nationalist resistance movements in the West Bank and Northern Ireland and, more recently, by Chechen rebels.
The Herald Sun reports:
A man opened fire at his stepmother with a sawn-off shotgun then apologised for the incident in a text message days later, a Melbourne court was told today.
Michael Duffy on the Hanson sentence:
In sentencing Hanson and her former colleague David Ettridge to a whopping three years in jail, Chief Justice Patsy Wolfe said: "The crimes you have committed affect the confidence of people in the electoral process."
This, of course, is complete rubbish. It's people's confidence in the legal process that has being undermined, because the sentence is so manifestly absurd. Only a judge could not see this.
Exactly.
Andrew Wilkie, the all-wise, all-seeing superexpert who quit his intelligence job because he believed the war in Iraq was wrong, has been jabbering about exaggerated weapons claims:
The federal government sexed up the threat posed by Iraq to justify going to war, a parliamentary inquiry was told today.
Andrew Wilkie, a former intelligence analyst with the Office of National Assessments, said the government deliberately skewed the truth and misled the public over Iraq's weapons capabilities.
This is the same man who before the war warned of terrible Iraqi disasters, including "a humanitarian disaster to overwhelm coalition forces. Just totally overwhelm them, with thousands of casualties, hundreds of thousands of refugees, internally displaced people, trying to move through their lines. That would play all sorts of havoc for the coalition military ... He could create a humanitarian disaster as part of a scorched-earth policy".
Sounds a little sexed-up, wouldn’t you say?
Sorry for the infrequent recent posting; I’ve been distracted by all these wicked screensavers I’ve been receiving.
Extracts from interviews done for the below-mentioned Bulletin piece:
Jeff Jarvis: The best thing about blogging: no editors.
Natalie Solent: I didn't think the following point up myself, but it really resonates with me: a few years back everyone was worried about how the electronic age was going to end up with us all fed by intravenous drips while gazing blankly at screens for every waking hour. As it turned out, though, the burst of growth in computer use came from people wishing to communicate.
Joanne Jacobs: Blogging is like the whole Bill of Rights wrapped up in one: Free speech, free press, right to assemble(virtually), right to petition for redress of grievances ... Well, I'm not sure blogging is about the right not to have soldiers quartered in your home. Maybe that's the ability to blog anonymously, so the mullahs won't send soldiers to your home to drag you off to prison or beat you to death.
Atrios: Obviously, remaining anonymous keeps me from parlaying the "success" of the blog into fame and riches, though aside from a few more media mentions or a radio appearance or two I doubt I'm missing out on much.
Colby Cosh: If traditional journalists truly are dismissive of weblogging, and some clearly are, it's bound to be out of fear, isn't it? I can't think of any other convincing explanation. Some fear is reasonable: webloggers are pushing the price of intelligent, informed commentary towards zero.
Glenn Reynolds (on how newspapers might deal with bloggers): Hiring them isn't a bad idea.
Natalie Solent: Writers are traditionally given two contradictory pieces of advice: 'be yourself' and 'consider your audience'. Blogging moves the lever hard over to the 'be yourself' end. Bloggers do not need to moderate their language, translate their quotes, conceal their prejudices, explain their Star Trek references, apologise for their taste in music or rein in their sentimentality.
Colby Cosh: If you have a surpassingly clever ten-word joke to make (and you often do), it can go straight up on the page; you don't have to scribble it into a notebook and wait six months to work it into an op-ed. Is it possible that, as e-mail revived the personal letter, weblogs may rescue the epigram?
Natalie Solent: The writers on The Corner do a lot of 'blegging' - asking readers to help them out with obscure information, cheerfully admitting that they want to know for their next column. It seems to work.
John Quiggin: I often make requests for help and get some useful stuff. For example, I was looking for books giving a favourable account of the Howard government's economic policies (there isn't much on this topic, and what there is is mostly critical) and Jack Strocchi suggested the OECD country reports, which I wouldn't have thought of.
Jeff Jarvis: Not only am I freed from deadlines (I can publish even sooner) and also from the limits of space (though most bloggers write more concisely than most print writers), I no longer have to worry about writing for the artificial audience of an editor; I write only for the real audience.
Stephen Green: My worry is that, like FM radio, blogging will someday be just as conformist and poll-driven as FM has become, and that the really independent voices will end up as little more than curiosities not unlike ham radio operators.
Joanne Jacobs: Blogging builds strong citizens 12 ways. (I couldn't remember how many ways Wonder Bread built strong bodies, so I googled it. But maybe you Aussies didn't get Wonder Bread commercials.)
(Note: Natalie Solent appears in this post but not in the article. How come? Because her excellent replies arrived after deadline. So I’ve slashed her payment.)
Letter of the week, from Peter Kennedy in today’s Australian:
Now that rebels are bombing the UN, water mains and oilfields belonging to the Iraqi people, where are all the human shields from Western countries who volunteered to sit on these structures to protect them from the evil Americans? It seems shielding the Iraqi people's vital assets is only necessary if it supports a brutal dictator.
If the human shields won’t help, maybe we should send in the giant beavers.