July 17, 2004

DISGRUNTLED STAFFER COMPLAINS

My unpaid promotional work for Michael Moore’s new movie continues. Fat bastard owes me thousands.

Posted by Tim Blair at July 17, 2004 04:15 AM
Comments

My prediction of the influence F911 will have on the US presidential election (as ranked with other influences):
1. the weather
2. voter apathy
3. voter confusion
4. hanging chads
5. negative TV ads
6. the price of gasoline
7. TV reruns
...about sixteen others I can't think of..
24. MM's F911

Posted by: rinardman at July 17, 2004 at 08:17 AM

You came across very well in that interview, Tim.

I'm starting to wonder whether Internet radio ought to be revived. Blogging wasn't around when the online radio concept flared and died a few years ago. I reckon it could be revived as a blog addendum for popular blogs, like yours. Start with an hour a week, maybe, an interview, then take calls from posters? Maybe something to think about. Cheers, By

Posted by: Byron_the_Aussie at July 17, 2004 at 09:54 AM

"Upaid??" What the frack is "Upaid"? You, son, are a JOKE UNTO YOURSELF. Your credibility, such as it was, is SHOT. Can't you afford a spellchecker? You are an affront to the BLOGOSPHERE!

Typographically challenged twerp.

Please fix.

Posted by: Howler at July 17, 2004 at 11:23 AM

Huh huh huh. You said "frack".

Posted by: Sortelli at July 17, 2004 at 11:40 AM

Good work Tim.

Posted by: Hatcher at July 17, 2004 at 12:40 PM

Upaid is a cunning neologism.

Just like "fundagelical".

or

"misunderestimate"

Posted by: Quentin George at July 17, 2004 at 01:15 PM

Upaid is fixd.

Posted by: tim at July 17, 2004 at 01:54 PM

I had to stop listening after 2 minutes and not because of the content. Can't people collect their thoughts and speak without filling up the conversation with considerable quantities of ums, ahs and assorted grunts? So much better to read the cleaned-up transcript. With the conversation tidied up the protagonists come across as articulate. No so in the flesh, so to speak. The lefty comes across as a dithering poseur.

Posted by: walter plinge at July 17, 2004 at 02:09 PM

TIM BLAIR: Formally.

ELEANOR HALL: …has contracts… or even formally has a lot of contracts in Iraq. What do you make of that? I mean he's suggesting that there is a degree of corruption. How do you interpret that?

Try 'formerly'.

Posted by: walter plinge at July 17, 2004 at 02:16 PM

Tim, since you're going unpaid, you might as well flog my new movie, Fahrenheit 9/11.

I made a QuickTime movie called Fahrenheit 9/11. It's posted to my blog here: http://caribpundit.blogspot.com/2004/07/u_108991188670907917.html.

Call it redressing the balance.

Posted by: Helen at July 17, 2004 at 04:40 PM

Who the heck is Andrew Wilkie? He's quoted as saying, "Fahrenheit 9/11 rambles along but it explains well how the Bush Administration hijacked September 11, 2001."

"Hijacked"? I'm really having a hard time believing he actually used the word "hijacked". He didn't really say that, did he?

Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 17, 2004 at 09:27 PM

Damn it, Den Beste! You know as well as I that Atta was employed by Halliburton!

Posted by: ushie at July 18, 2004 at 01:04 AM

Good work, bloghead.

Posted by: Miranda Divide at July 18, 2004 at 03:32 AM

You're crap on radio too Fatty.

Yes, Moore's a rather ham-fisted director isn't he. He'd want to be hold all the money his movies make. Of course you're an expert in cinema, with a trophy cabinet chockas with Palme D'ors and Oscars. (And I don't spose - ha - there's any fuckin Walkelys in there! ... oh ... that's funny.) Indeed I'm sure whenever someone's making a doco they consult you about it. Hmm, wonder what that right-wing blogging guy thinks about this scene ... what his thoughts on the dolly shot panning to the ... fuckin whatever shot are. Infact it's a wonder Moorey didn't credit you in his acceptance speech. His next one for the Oscar should be a ripper. Bet y'all are lookin for'd to that one, hey kids? Get the magnum out for an Elvis on the tv?

anyway.

Posted by: Steve at July 18, 2004 at 07:22 AM

Steve mate, you need to relax.

Posted by: Quentin George at July 18, 2004 at 10:02 AM

Was that one of Steve's "defensive attacks"?

Posted by: Sortelli at July 18, 2004 at 11:32 AM

Tim, it would have helped, if you had pointed out that Haliburton also had the same kind of exclusive contracts with the Clinton Administration. This was for similar types of work, in the mess formerly known as Yugoslavia. You are correct, in that there are only a few companies that can handle work on this scale. In the U.S., Haliburton and Bechtel are the best known.

Posted by: CGeib at July 18, 2004 at 03:05 PM

Tim, it would have helped, if you had pointed out that Haliburton also had the same kind of exclusive contracts with the Clinton Administration. This was for similar types of work, in the mess formerly known as Yugoslavia. You are correct, in that there are only a few companies that can handle work on this scale. In the U.S., Haliburton and Bechtel are the best known.

Interesting. I hadn't heard this before either, though it does make sense.

Posted by: Andjam at July 18, 2004 at 03:39 PM

Well Tim, if you're going to insist upon being Mikey's cheerleader down under, it would certainly help if you had some handy crib notes to prepare for maximum flexibility in discussing the film's...er...maximum flexibilities.

Pointers to the comprehensive list of 56 deceptions contained in F911 can be found here.

Disclaimer: well yes, that link goes to Silent Running, and the points are linked to from there. Well, if you can trumpet Mr. Moore's acheivements, well then...oh nevermind.

Posted by: Wind Rider at July 18, 2004 at 03:48 PM

Andjam -- Halliburton (and one of its subsidaries, Kellog, Brown, and Root) have been outsourcing work for the military for years. Other contractors as well, under a program known as Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, or LOGCAP.

KBR had a big mission in Yugoslavia putting in bases and then supporting them (still might have the support mission). And I believe they also did some reconstruction work, but I can't verify that. They are doing the same thing in Iraq now, but they aren't the only contractor, from what I am hearing.

This is one reason why I am not worried about any Halliburton ties to the current administration -- Halliburton has always had their fingers in the pie, regardless of who is in the White House.

Posted by: The Real JeffS at July 19, 2004 at 02:33 AM