January 07, 2004

APOLOGIES DEMANDED

A letter to the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz:

Knoxville, Tenn.: Why have we not seen one retaction or apology from any major pundit over the way they hammered Gov. Howard Dean after his comments that arresting Saddam would not reduce the threats of continuing terrorism? Now that we enter the second week of "Code Orange" and we are told it will last at least until the end of January -- it is shameful how the press can't bring themselves to say they were wrong. You demand perfection out of Gov. Dean and jump on any minor mis-speak yet when Bush was caught lying repeatedly about the Thanksgiving trip to Bagdad (British Airways-Plastic Turkey-Fox News reporter calling his office) silence is the order of the day.

And the reply:

Howard Kurtz: I think that's a fair point. The rival Democrats who ganged up on Dean over that statement have also failed to apologize. Of course, just because we're in an orange alert doesn't necessarily mean that the capture of Saddam hasn't made Americans, or at least American troops, somewhat safer. After all, Saddam in the spider hole was playing some role in the continuing attacks inside Iraq. But Dean was obviously trying to make a point about the broader war on terror.

Kurtz somehow missed that the “Bush lie” about the plastic turkey was itself a lie; nobody to date has apologised for that. As for the press jumping on “any minor mis-speak” from Howard ... tell George W. Bush about it, Mr. Knoxville. Besides which, Howard’s mis-speaks aren’t exactly minor. Sometimes they’re howling contradictions of his earlier statements. Maybe the Amazing Kreskin's Dean prediction will be proved correct.

Posted by Tim Blair at January 7, 2004 12:06 AM
Comments

Truly, the deathless Quetzalcoatl of plastic birds.

Posted by: ForNow at January 7, 2004 at 12:29 AM

I heard John McLaughlin repeat the plastic turkey lie on last Sunday's show. It was in relation to some "award" for Best Political Theater.

Posted by: Lawrence at January 7, 2004 at 01:14 AM

But Dean was obviously trying to make a point about the broader war on terror.

Yeah, and that broader point is also completely wrong. You really have to be a genuine idiot to believe that Saddam's removal doesn't make the planet safer for Americans in both the short and long terms.

Posted by: R. C. Dean at January 7, 2004 at 01:14 AM

What an amazing phenomenon this whole plastic turky thing is. I believe it's longevity and obsessive repetition in the leftist press is psycologically significant, it can't have seized the imaginations of the washed-up marxist dorks like it has without fulfilling some deep need.

Was it a viscerial reaction to Bush's courage in flying into a warzone for thanksgiving? A desperate need to refute the guesture by fixation on an irrelevant detail, a fixation that verges on lunacy?

It's often said that leftists don't think, they feel. What powerful revulsion or insecurity has made it so desperatly important for them that the turky be fake?

Posted by: Amos at January 7, 2004 at 01:28 AM

At any rate, the whole thing is inane. The original issue was whether the capture of Saddam would deflate terrorism in Iraq, not what effect it would have on existing al-Qaeda or other terrorist cells within two weeks!

Honestly, when leftists rage against straw men like this, it's hard to tell whether they think we're that stupid or if they genuinely believe their own stupidity. Kurtz' correspondent certainly seems sincere.

Posted by: Otter at January 7, 2004 at 01:54 AM

The leftists’ need for the turkey to be fake is itself a development of their need for the turkey-moment to have been scripted, manipulative, conceived by Karl Rove earlier & far away.

Another example:

Doubtless, Bush’s PR people like him to be photographed driving a pickup truck & cutting underbrush, & doing things like those which millions of Americans do. Bush does them & likes to. He talks like a Texan though not born there. Some act like that’s a crime. He’s taken to Texas like a fish to water. The left hates this really because it makes it harder for them to paint him as out of touch like they did to his father.

FIRST: the left whines & snivels about how Bush is behaving like a cowboy! We can’t escape it for a moment. THEN we look up from whatever we’re doing & say, hey, we like cowboys, that’s a compliment. Half of us have never really thought about Bush as cowboy before, but at length we’re all rootin’ & tootin’ & firing imaginary guns in the air, waHOO! Ride ’em cowboy! FINALLY the left switches tacks & goes into a snit of “whoah there!” saying though Bush wears denhim, works on his ranch, & talks colloquial Texas talk, still the image is insufficiently literal, it’s manipulative, since Bush is not really a cowboy after all, since he doesn’t make his living mainly while riding a horse.

What it’s about is the left’s continually trying to work up an interpretation, a lens, which—if you look through it juuust right & keep still & pretend nothing else exists—makes Bush look phoney. Such an interpretation typically proves at variance with fact, incoherent, &/or trivial, the moment one reflects critically or gets collateral information. So it takes obsessiveness to keep the interpretation. Its flimsiness drives the left crazy, almost as if it were their targets’ fault. The left rages partly because people will not join with them in the practice this crazy obsessive “art” of keeping resolutely focussed on these crazy & sometimes clashing interpretations, these optical effects, like one of those sculptures of an impossible triangle that works with angles lining up if you look at it from just the right distance & angle, with one eye shut, & keep perfectly still, like the “mother” at the end of Psycho. How’s that for an optical effect?

Posted by: ForNow at January 7, 2004 at 04:12 AM

Speaking as another Knoxvillian, I can tell you this dolt is in the minority 'round these parts. Lefties in Tennessee are still apoplectic that Bush carried the state and with it the White House.

Posted by: Drake at January 7, 2004 at 07:11 AM

Regarding the "Fox News reporter calling his office", I recall him saying that during one of the first broadcasts that morning, and have always wondered whether I misheard him, because he didn't repeat it.

Posted by: RonB at January 7, 2004 at 07:21 AM

Maybe Kreskin will donate one of these to Howlin' Howie:

Kreskin's Power Pendulum

Kreskin can rapidly teach you how to use his Power Pendulum in a wide variety of ways that can tap into one's business, personal problems, relationships as well as a lively party interaction with others. The kit consists of one (1) Kreskin Power Pendulum, an instruction booklet, and an audio tape of Kreskin's voice directing in training your mind to respond through the pendulum.

Posted by: mojo at January 7, 2004 at 09:25 AM