December 29, 2003

PRESS FREEDOM IN FRANCE

I believe this is commonly referred to as the crushing of dissent:

Alain Hertoghe believes that in covering the Iraq conflict, French newspapers recreated "the war they would have liked to have seen." That meant concentration on the Vietnams and Stalingrads that didn't take place, he said, and so many more accounts of U.S. difficulties rather than advances that it was "impossible to understand how the Americans won."

For making assertions like these in a book called "La Guerre à Outrances," subtitled "How the press disinformed us on Iraq" and published by Calmann Lévy, Hertoghe was fired this month from his post as deputy editor at the Web site of La Croix, a respected Roman Catholic daily newspaper.

The newspaper's management justified the dismissal, Hertoghe said in an interview, by contending that the book demonstrated his opposition to La Croix's editorial line, damaged the reputation of the newspaper and the authority of its chief editors and questioned the professional ethics of some of the paper's staff members.

The rest of the piece is fascinating. Turns out France is just like Australia! Well, media-wise, anyway.

UPDATE. Instapundit covers the German angle.

Posted by Tim Blair at December 29, 2003 04:29 PM
Comments

Except they write in French- it's like they have a different word for everything!

Hey- just like Margo Kingston!

Posted by: Habib at December 29, 2003 at 04:52 PM

You mean "Margeaux Kingstonne"

Posted by: tim at December 29, 2003 at 04:55 PM

Margauche Ville-de-roi?

Posted by: Peggy Sue at December 29, 2003 at 05:54 PM

Actually, pretty much the same thing happened in the US. Bernard Goldberg, who worked for CBS, did an editorial in a paper on how the media was biased in some cases. He was pretty much immediately demoted, and later had to leave CBS.
(He wrote a book about this, Bias. Which is funny, as he seems to be slightly left of center, but in CBS terms, if you're not far left, then you don't belong)

Posted by: Jeremy at December 29, 2003 at 06:48 PM

Holidaying with the girlfriend (who is French) in France at the moment and hqve seen much of this sort of bias in the magazines here. Example - Paris Match magazine (one of the most subscribed to in France) ran an article on the war in Iraq last week that juxtaposed a dodgy GWB interview with photos of returned US soldiers that had sadly lost limbs defending our freedom. 2 pages of interview with GWB, six pages of photos and words describing the "real" war in Iraq. If this wasn't enough, I opened Figaro magazine last night and was greeted with a story on the "real" French peacekeeping mission in the Ivory Coast.

No lost limbs - just smiling people, happy to see Frog soldiers and laughing politicians apparantly glad to be enjopying a visit from heavily armed paratroops.

French press biased? OUI!

Posted by: Dylan Kissane at December 29, 2003 at 08:21 PM

Holidaying with the girlfriend (who is French) in France at the moment and hqve seen much of this sort of bias in the magazines here. Example - Paris Match magazine (one of the most subscribed to in France) ran an article on the war in Iraq last week that juxtaposed a dodgy GWB interview with photos of returned US soldiers that had sadly lost limbs defending our freedom. 2 pages of interview with GWB, six pages of photos and words describing the "real" war in Iraq. If this wasn't enough, I opened Figaro magazine last night and was greeted with a story on the "real" French peacekeeping mission in the Ivory Coast.

No lost limbs - just smiling people, happy to see Frog soldiers and laughing politicians apparantly glad to be enjopying a visit from heavily armed paratroops.

French press biased? OUI!

Posted by: Dylan Kissane at December 29, 2003 at 08:21 PM

Good to see that this piece ran in the IHT. That paper was as guilty as the French media in the distortion of war news from Afghanistan and Iraq. I'll never forget IHT's story on how the Pentagon's battle plans in Afghanistan had gone awry -- this appeared the day before the Taliban fled Kabul. IHT coverage of Iraq was and remains inaccurate and absolutley disgraceful -- but, then, you'd expect that now that the NY Times owns the operation 100% -- and, by the way, it's headquartered in Paris, the bad one in France, not the good one in Texas.

Posted by: Lewis at December 30, 2003 at 12:15 AM

When the facts do not support the theory, the old saying goes, the facts must be disposed of.

The problem, of course, is what happens when the facts won't stay disposed.

At what point does the divergence between what's being reported and what's actually happening become so large, that it affects the unwashed masses? How will they react?

We're seeing some of this in the Middle East, where constant reporting on how badly the war was going left the Arab masses utterly bewildered when not only did Baghdad fall w/o a fight, but Saddam fell w/o one, too. IF the US pulls it off in Iraq, how will France react? If the rest of the world DOESN'T line up behind France, and against us, how will the French (and the rest of Europe) react?

Posted by: Dean at December 30, 2003 at 01:40 AM

The article’s author John Vinocur is always worth reading. In particular, read “Chirac arrives at a crossroads” if you haven’t yet. Notable & still very relevant.

Posted by: ForNow at December 30, 2003 at 05:38 AM

The only French 'paper worth reading.

Posted by: ilibcc at December 30, 2003 at 04:08 PM

Mr Hertoghe said that America won the war? Which "war" was he referring to? The last war that the U.S. won was WWII

Posted by: Roberto at December 31, 2003 at 08:06 AM

Mr Hertoghe said that America won the war? Which "war" was he referring to? The last war that the U.S. won was WWII

Posted by: Roberto at December 31, 2003 at 08:06 AM

Really, Roberto?

One wonders what the South Korean people might say to that?

Or the Grenadans and the Panamanians. (Doctor Weevil has some interesting commentary about the state of political freedom in both those places.)

Do you think the women of Afghanistan find themselves worse off?

And, if we think of the Cold War as a war (and there's much to that, one would think), then the folks in the former Soviet republics can, rightfully, chalk up a victory that belongs to the West as a whole, but a Western victory that was the result of American leadership and Anglospheric courage and dauntlessness.

Posted by: Dean at December 31, 2003 at 08:12 AM

Dean — Hillary does. In a recent speech, she said the Russian invasion of Afghanistan "...opened up opportunities for Afghan women."

Of course. Around the world,since 1945, millions of women have found new opportunities under Russian soldiers...

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at January 2, 2004 at 04:44 AM