July 17, 2003

WORD FUN WITH PHILLIP THE DUCK

Is it plagiarism if you acknowledge a source while plundering enough material to compose an entire column? Maybe not, but it sure as hell is lazy, and definitely not worth paying for. Professor Bunyip -- no lazybones he -- has caught Phillip Adams rewriting an article from the New York Review of Books (for the second time).

But before you visit the Bunyip for the full story on The Australian’s untouchable rewrite robot, take this fun online quiz:

What Did Phillip Adams Write? Select A or B from each of the following nine pairs of extracts from Phil’s column and The New York Review of Books article he harvested:

1. A: The centre was managed by Jim Wilkinson, a 32-year-old Texan and protege of the brothers Bush. When last seen, Wilkinson had been speaking on behalf of Republican activists protesting against the Florida ballot recount.

B: The Coalition Media Center is managed by Jim Wilkinson, a fresh-faced, thirty-two-year-old Texan and a protégé of Bush's adviser Karen Hughes. Wilkinson made his mark during the 2000 presidential election when he spoke on behalf of GOP activists protesting the Florida ballot recount.

2. A: Jim Wilkinson was known to rebuke reporters whose copy he deemed insufficiently supportive of the war; he darkly warned one correspondent that he was on a "list" along with two other reporters at his paper.

B: Wilkinson would loudly rebuke reporters whose copy seemed insufficiently supportive of the war – and recalcitrants were warned that they were on a list.

3. A: ... in contrast to the ranks of retired generals and colonels we saw enthusing about the war on American TV.

B: ... in contrast to the retired generals and colonels we saw on American TV.

4. A: All Mintier had to do was echo Brooks points with clear approval.

B: CNN's Tom Mintier, by contrast, would faithfully recite Brooks's main points, often with signs of approval.

5. A: Al-Jazeera took us to hospital wards to show us screaming children, women in pain, men without limbs. The camera lingered on stumps, head wounds, and tubes inserted in nostrils and chests. On gurneys in hallways lay bodies bandaged, bloodied, and burned ...

B: Al-Jazeera was taking cameras into hospital wards to show screaming children, women in pain, men without limbs, bodies bandaged and bloodied on gurneys.

6. A: With a much smaller staff than the BBC, this London-based channel (partly owned by Rupert Murdoch) seemed far more nimble. One of its correspondents, Geoff Meade, became known at the media center for his sharp, if sometimes grandiloquent, questions.

B: With a much smaller staff, Sky's team was judged more nimble – with one correspondent, Jeff Meade, singled out for special praise.

7. A: CNN's international service was repackaged, bearing more resemblance to the BBC than to its domestic –- and domesticated – edition.

B: CNN International bore more resemblance to the BBC than to its domestic edition -— a difference that showed just how market-driven were the tone and content of the broadcasts.

8. A: Wilkinson, a member of the naval reserve, appeared in the same beige fatigues as the career officers working under him.

B: The Bush activist was repackaged as a member of the Naval Reserve, appearing in beige fatigues identical to the career officers working beneath him.

9. A: As Baghdad was about to fall – without the discovery of a single weapon of mass destruction – Meade asked: "Is this war going to make history by being the first to end before its cause could be found?"

B: When Baghdad was about to fall without the discovery of any weapons of mass destruction, he asked, "Is this war going to make history by being the first to end before its cause could be found?"

Answers two posts below. All hail the Bunyip!

Posted by Tim Blair at July 17, 2003 02:40 AM
Comments

Gee, Phil seems like such a nice guy and it turns out he's a shameless thief (again). Go figure.

Posted by: ZsaZsa at July 17, 2003 at 03:32 AM

And they say you can't teach an old dog new tricks, maybe Janet Albrechtson's rubbing off (or up against) him?

Posted by: zilla at July 17, 2003 at 03:38 AM

Well, it's fat and slack like Phil's lardy guts, but I don't know if we can actually call this brilliant detective work. After all, Adams mentioned the NYRoB article in "his" column.

Posted by: Mark at July 17, 2003 at 10:10 AM

All sentences B. It is Phil's style to use twenty words ( of above those not in bold)when, 1 or three will do. In Phillpic's case, none is preferrable but, hey, he's a rhino on the loose .

Posted by: d at July 17, 2003 at 10:22 AM

Mark, no it didn't require much detective work on Bunyip's part but that proves the coppers' wisdom that it's a good thing most crooks are stupid or they wouldn't get caught. In Adams's case, substitute "arrogant" for "stupid". He's been a national treasure for so long, he thinks his shit doesn't stink.

Posted by: suberboot at July 17, 2003 at 11:06 AM

The fat bastard did have one good idea in the column- replacing the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission with a House Un-Australian Activities Committee; a blacklist could be a lot of fun, and how would the worker's freind Phil keep himself in truffles and Bollinger if not being paid by the Oz and the ABC?
If forced to live of his wits, those XXOS black skivvies would be hanging off him like a parachute in no time.

Posted by: Paul Bickford at July 17, 2003 at 11:40 AM

Please... don't include this guy in with us ducks.

Posted by: Wonderduck at July 17, 2003 at 03:18 PM

I would faithfully recite Tim Blair's main points, often with signs of approval.

Posted by: Dr Jack at July 17, 2003 at 07:08 PM