September 23, 2004

CLEAN GLASS FOR ALL!

Scroll down to the end of the list. Note the candidate's occupation. This man must be elected.

Posted by Tim Blair at September 23, 2004 02:52 AM
Comments

I hear he has a squeaky-clean reputation...

Posted by: Lexine at September 23, 2004 at 04:31 AM

He was also the only one willing to post his phone number and address.

Truly a man of the people.

...but doesn't Squeegee have only the one g? Or is this some strange downunderism, like koala-baiting?

Posted by: Sigivald at September 23, 2004 at 04:49 AM

"Hey, Mr. Squeegyman, squeegy me banana..."

No, I don't know where that came from, but I'm sure glad it out of my head...

Posted by: mojo at September 23, 2004 at 05:57 AM

His job experience will pay off when cleaning up parliment.
He included his number also "open, honest and squeegy clean" is obviously his motto.

Posted by: Genius at September 23, 2004 at 06:10 AM

I'd think "Greater transparency in government" would be his motto.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek at September 23, 2004 at 06:23 AM

Always wanted to work in the government but found himself on teh outside looking in...

Gah! Sadly, the best I could do...

Posted by: Guy from Ohio at September 23, 2004 at 06:31 AM

"And let me make this perfectly clear..."

Posted by: Parker at September 23, 2004 at 07:12 AM

And he's actually willing to tell people where he lives! That guy's too cool for school!

I say we send the man a box of steaks...

Posted by: Joe at September 23, 2004 at 07:50 AM

And he's actually willing to tell people where he lives!

That's probably because it's a) a flophouse or b) a jail.

When I was in Oz, I couldn't find any squeegees, and had to settle for a "window washer".

Posted by: Angie Schultz at September 23, 2004 at 08:07 AM

I live in Canberra.
The place that guy lives is a dilapated public housing block. I wouldn't let my dog live there.

Posted by: Quentin George at September 23, 2004 at 08:09 AM

...by the way, check out the occupation for "Guy Freemarijuana" on the Queensland Senate list.

"Artist/Poet".

Posted by: Quentin George at September 23, 2004 at 08:09 AM

Peter Garrett, ALP....musician?

Talk about living in the past.

Posted by: BT at September 23, 2004 at 08:59 AM

Andrew Wilkie, Greens...author? (pisses self laughing).

Posted by: BT at September 23, 2004 at 09:04 AM

Andrew Wilkie - fiction writer

Posted by: amortiser at September 23, 2004 at 09:33 AM

And did you note Peter Garrett's address - "MITTAGONG". Not quite in his electorate...

Posted by: haroldbeagle at September 23, 2004 at 09:54 AM

C ALP 2 SMITH, David Australian Labor Party (ACT Branch) No occupation


Interesting party choice for someone who does not labor.

Posted by: Thomas at September 23, 2004 at 10:33 AM

Notice Kerrie Tucker's profession ........... politician.....but she is not noted as being a sitting member............how can profession be a politician and not sitting??????? Maybe she meant to put aspiring in front of it?????

Posted by: David at September 23, 2004 at 10:46 AM

David - to be fair to Kerrie Tucker (who I will be placing near last on my ballot paper) she has been a sitting member in the ACT Assembly and is well known locally as a politician.

Posted by: procrustes at September 23, 2004 at 11:03 AM

Kerrie Tucker is a member of the ACT Assembly. She's a bit of a threat to the sitting Liberal Party senator Humphries for the second senate spot.

Posted by: Tortfeaser at September 23, 2004 at 11:05 AM

Keeping the (car windows of) the bastards honest(ly clean)

Posted by: Dylan at September 23, 2004 at 11:19 AM

Will he be climbing the ladder of oppportunity to clean the windows of perception?

Posted by: slatts at September 23, 2004 at 11:34 AM

Let's hope he doesn't hit the glass ceiling.

Posted by: Andrew D. at September 23, 2004 at 11:48 AM

Thomas

I think David Smith has given "no occupation" becasue he was a public servant who, under Commonwealth law must resign, and under ACT protocols is expected to resign, to contest an election. These laws also allow him to be reemployed should he be unsuccessful

Posted by: Consuela Potez at September 23, 2004 at 11:49 AM

Thanks CP, I just figured him for a slacker

I stand corrected.

Posted by: Thomas at September 23, 2004 at 12:31 PM

Does anyone know which squeegyman this is? The guy on Barry/Northbourne is a bit scary - wouldnt vote for him. But the guy on Antill/Northbourne is fantastic - and he works about twelve hours a day - put most of our pols to shame!

Posted by: Kimbo at September 23, 2004 at 12:53 PM

This made me laugh out loud. Thank you.

Posted by: julie at September 23, 2004 at 01:25 PM

Hmm, if he wins, is this a step UP in his career or a step down?

Okay, okay, I know the answer. Don't everyone shout at the same time.

SMG

Posted by: SteveMG at September 23, 2004 at 01:57 PM

Kimbo : Agree with you on both counts re Quality of Squeegeeness. (I live on Burn St in Downer, only a few humdred metres from both intersections).

Does anyone know what this guy's policies are BTW?

Note for non-Aussies: We have to vote for everyone, in order of preference. So we need to know the policies of the minor candidates. This guy gets bonus points for the address and occupation, but if he thinks Bob Brown doesn't go far enough in bashing the USA, he'll be in double-digits on my ballot paper, rather than no 1 to 3.

Posted by: Alan E Brain at September 23, 2004 at 02:04 PM

Will he snap the Opposition's windscreen wipers if they disagree with him?

Posted by: Freddyboy at September 23, 2004 at 02:06 PM

When Latham was refering to the 'ladder of opportunity' did he have the squeegee guy directly in mind?

Squeegee policies for all!!!

Posted by: nic at September 23, 2004 at 02:49 PM

I agree Kimbo, he's brilliant.

Does this mean I can count the money I give him for cleaning my windscreen as a tax-deductable political donation?

Posted by: Art Vandelay at September 23, 2004 at 03:12 PM

I notice the Greens Number 2 (stop that laughing up the back) is a 'Political Advisor'. Hmm...like Omarosa?

Posted by: David Morgan at September 23, 2004 at 07:12 PM

Best. Thread. Ever.

Posted by: Sortelli at September 23, 2004 at 07:42 PM

I will go to Canberra and clean house.(In german accent)

Posted by: Le clerc at September 23, 2004 at 10:20 PM

He's going about this all wrong for a squeegeeman. He should just go to the Senate(?) and start doing legislative stuff, THEN ask to be elected and paid.


Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds at September 24, 2004 at 01:51 AM

kimbo, since when have ozzis used the term "guy"? I have travelled this entire land, except for inside the briz-adel triangle, & have NEVER heard the word "guy" except in connection with guy fawkes, r u sure u r ozzi?

Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2004 at 03:46 AM

I use "guy" all the time. Why not?

Posted by: Quentin George at September 24, 2004 at 08:11 AM

In the service industry 'Guy' is now the generic word for people as in 'G'day, guys, what can I get you?' even if the customers are male and female.

Posted by: ilibcc at September 24, 2004 at 09:34 AM

Steve:

I live in Adelaide - part of "the briz-adel triangle" - and I can assure you the similarities between that triangle and the Sunni triangle in Iraq are mostly superficial.

Posted by: Dylan at September 24, 2004 at 09:53 AM

Definitely an aussie, Steve. We dont really have a version of 'guy', except maybe 'bloke' or 'fella' - which are on the way to becoming anachronisms. As illibc points out, 'guy' can now be used for both sexes - which is handy. My teenage kids use 'guy' all the time (not surprising given their TV/Internet habits) - so I guess they have corrupted me!

Posted by: Kimbo at September 24, 2004 at 10:34 AM

Peter Garrett is both a rock musician and an anti-nuclear political activist.

Which means he's probably the only guy in Australia who's had a chance to share a gig with both Joe Camilleri and Joe Camilleri.

Posted by: Uncle Milk at September 24, 2004 at 11:59 AM

Did anyone catch The Chaser last night . . . . very funny, especially the news ticker running along the bottom that read "Margo Kingston realises 'Online Political Editor' is not a prestigous job title after all".

Nyuk nyuk.

Posted by: steve at September 24, 2004 at 01:11 PM

Gosh, maybe I should get around & become more cosmopolitan. No reason to not use guys, except "hi" & "guys" are used as homophobic insults, for reasons of self-preservation I usually greet ppl with "gooday fellers" & refer to "those blokes over there". Perhaps if I were to live in Victoria or somewhere I may for the same chameleon like reasons, drop the ozzi lingo & talk like a local.

Posted by: steve at September 24, 2004 at 01:21 PM

Guys a homophobic insult? I've heard gay people use it all the time! Or is this a "Black-people-can-say-nigger-but-no-one-else" sort of thing?

Posted by: Quentin George at September 24, 2004 at 05:23 PM

Er.. never knowingly met a "gay" (as u call them) person, to the best of my knowledge there is not one (who has come out) within hundreds of miles of here. Nobdy to be offended, so any such remarks of purely in jest, or are "fighting words". In narrow minded & coarse company, announcing oneself with "hi guys" = rapid onset of a brawl, with yourself as the target. In more enlightened company, it would be met with raised pinkies all round & some falsetto voice remarks.

Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2004 at 06:27 PM

The gays get their own back, the gay guy I work with insists on calling all the blokes sweetie or honey.

Posted by: ilibcc at September 25, 2004 at 10:01 AM

Strewth, what are you talking about. I have never heard the term "guy" deeemed as homophobic and all my male friends are to the other side of straight.

Having said that it is an example of rampant American cultural imperialism...etc etc etc blah, blah, blah.

I wish I could describe myself as a squeegywoman if I ran for parliament. Darlene - cleans windows and the country.

Alas, apparently I would have to give up my extremely low level (AO minus100) public servant position if I did.

Posted by: Darlene at September 25, 2004 at 04:29 PM

Having said that it is an example of rampant American cultural imperialism

Yep. It's all part of the master plan:

1) Imperialize Australian culture, aided by the Free Trade Agreement
2) Annex Australia directly, admitting each state directly into the Union.
3) Move the U.S. Federal Government to the Australian Capital Territory.
4) Pass a special 273% income tax on DC residents, and then convert the depopulated fover capital into one 68-square-mile park/monument/museum.
5) Have John Kerry walk into a bar and say, "Hi, guys!"

Posted by: Warmongering Lunatic at September 27, 2004 at 12:11 PM

Go squeegee guy. And Steve, I stuck up for you over the metric system, but I don't know how you've managed to get across the country without hearing the word 'guy'. I'm even more surprised you've actually heard Aussies talk about Guy Fawkes Day - they'd be more likely to talk about Guy Sebastian.

You're not alone in your dislike of the word 'guy' though. As a magazine professional, I can tell you there are some (light-hearted, jocular) titles which routinely change the word 'guy' in quotes to either 'bloke' or 'fella' (which interviewees almost never use).

And Quentin, what's your point about the state of the building squeegee guy lives in? Surely for admitting it he's even braver than we thought. It's interesting you say you wouldn't let your dog live there, yet that's exactly where we send the nation's poor.

And I hope if elected that squeegee guy attends the Senate in a pair of stubbies, barechested, with a smoke behind his ear and a flanno tucked into his shorts. Otherwise he'd just be selling out.

Posted by: Karl at September 27, 2004 at 05:44 PM

There was a labor Member for Mitchell in the WA Parliament in the late 80's and 90's. He was otherwise unemployable (a lawyer), so it's funny how these guys replicate themselves.

Posted by: os at September 27, 2004 at 08:07 PM

There was a labor Member for Mitchell named David Smith in the WA Parliament in the late 80's and 90's. He was otherwise unemployable (a lawyer), so it's funny how these guys replicate themselves.

Posted by: os at September 27, 2004 at 08:07 PM

And Quentin, what's your point about the state of the building squeegee guy lives in? Surely for admitting it he's even braver than we thought. It's interesting you say you wouldn't let your dog live there, yet that's exactly where we send the nation's poor.

Read Angie's above comment. It's not people who are "poor" who live in these dilapidated public housing blocks. They almost always have a drug problem or another social dysfunction apart from lack of funds.

The one that was near me was closed down, condemned and demolished because of rampant crime and drug use.

Posted by: Quentin George at September 27, 2004 at 09:14 PM

How do I manage to get around this country without hearing the word "guy"? Cleary I mix only in very select circles, & consequently posses an incorrectly slanted view of australia. (Sort of like a Fairfax journalist?)

Posted by: Steve at September 28, 2004 at 01:28 AM