September 08, 2004

CONVERTING ALLAH

All deities are as one in the New York Times. God, Allah, Buddha ... what's the diff? It’s all just the same old beardy guy living in the sky, right? Dawn Eden notes the Times' happy monotheism:

The wire services reported, in a quote printed in thousands of newspapers, that the captured Beslan terrorist said, "By Allah, I did not shoot."

Today's Times piece quotes him as saying, "By God, I did not shoot"- a translation that no other news organization has used.

In other words, the Times wanted so badly to leave Islam out of its Beslan feature that it altered the terrorist's quote.

Meanwhile Daniel Pipes has compiled a list of terrorist euphemisms employed worldwide for the Beslan bastards:

* Assailants - National Public Radio.
* Attackers – the Economist.
* Bombers – the Guardian.
* Captors – the Associated Press.
* Commandos – Agence France-Presse refers to the terrorists both as "membres du commando" and "commando."
* Criminals - the Times (London).
* Extremists – United Press International.
* Fighters – the Washington Post.
* Group – the Australian.
* Guerrillas: in a New York Post editorial.
* Gunmen – Reuters.
* Hostage-takers - the Los Angeles Times.
* Insurgents – in a New York Times headline.
* Kidnappers – the Observer (London).
* Militants – the Chicago Tribune.
* Perpetrators – the New York Times.
* Radicals – the BBC.
* Rebels – in a Sydney Morning Herald headline.
* Separatists – the Christian Science Monitor.

And my favorite:

* Activists – the Pakistan Times.

(Via Angela Bell)

Posted by Tim Blair at September 8, 2004 04:58 PM
Comments

In order to taint Bush, I am surprised the media has not tried to slip in words like "conservatives" or "religious fundamentalists" instead of murdering Islamofacists.

Posted by: perfectsense at September 8, 2004 at 05:03 PM

Just a possibility, but:

Saints -- The Green Left Weekly (or maybe the Sydney Morning Herald too)

Posted by: Richard at September 8, 2004 at 05:07 PM

You forgot

Minutemen - Michael Moore

Posted by: Quentin George at September 8, 2004 at 05:17 PM

Spiritual leader?

An extremist Islamic cleric based in Britain said yesterday that he would support hostage-taking at British schools if carried out by terrorists with a just cause.

Omar Bakri Mohammed, the spiritual leader of the extremist sect al-Muhajiroun, said that holding women and children hostage would be a reasonable course of action for a Muslim who has suffered under British rule.

Posted by: ilibcc at September 8, 2004 at 05:19 PM

"Not Happy, John, George, and Tony! jihadist gentlemen".

Posted by: Margo at September 8, 2004 at 05:23 PM

I'm thinking more like "Desperate Weapons Experts," "Troubled souls," "Free-thinking Kalashnikov Enthusiasts," "Relectant Retributionists," "Latter-Day Hannibals," "The Boston Teetotalers," "The Nathan Hales of the Northern Caucusses..."

No matter. To Margo they'll always be: "Chetchyns."

Posted by: the UNPOPULIST at September 8, 2004 at 05:41 PM

"Religious studies group".

Posted by: EvilPundit at September 8, 2004 at 05:56 PM

What about "baddies"? Too judgemental?

Posted by: fidens at September 8, 2004 at 05:59 PM

al-Jazeera calls them "martyrs", and Osama calls them "suckers".

Posted by: charlotte at September 8, 2004 at 06:06 PM

The NYT could also have disguised it by putting it in Arabic: "Vallahi, I did not shoot..."

Posted by: Freddyboy at September 8, 2004 at 06:24 PM

In the spirit though in a slightly different part of the world, ABC Radio (Aust) this morning was again referring to Hamas "militia" attacking Jewish settlers in retaliation for Israeli Defence Forces killing Hamas "foot soldiers". I've never been one to yell at the radio before but my neighbours at least now know that Hamas are "terrorists".

Posted by: John at September 8, 2004 at 06:31 PM

AAP ran an AFP piece which referred to the Beslan school crisis.
For pulication it was changed to massacre.

Posted by: slatts at September 8, 2004 at 06:50 PM

AAP ran an AFP piece which referred to the Beslan school crisis.
For publication it was changed to massacre.

Posted by: slatts at September 8, 2004 at 06:51 PM

I'm surprised they haven't been referred to as 'poor oppressed Freedom Fighters' yet.

Posted by: Chris Josephson at September 8, 2004 at 07:10 PM

"Underground" is used as well when the word terrorist is seeing as being too judgemental but "freedom fighter" too risible. See also "pre state militia". I suppose I have less difficulties with those who support their aims describing terrorists as such but why international news organisations feel the need to do the same escapes me.

Posted by: cac at September 8, 2004 at 08:35 PM

Well last night on Lateline, Tony Jones let "terrorist" slip. The correspondent in Moscow was clearly distressed as she didn't want to seem like a fool by following up with one of the GayBC euphemisms. So for one interview, they were "terrorists" on the GayBC.

Posted by: neoconchick at September 8, 2004 at 08:42 PM

"Asuming room-temperature" Would do for my favorit description of those shits

Posted by: Cardinal Biggles at September 8, 2004 at 08:52 PM

How about 'Assholes'?

Posted by: CujoQuarrel at September 8, 2004 at 09:05 PM

YES Shameful euphemisms without question.
Only Putin and Sharon dare use the words islamic jihad murderers.
Has the whole of the world's press and tv media now been bought by Saudi oil money ?
Perhaps some clear thinking poster can explain
Why we are unwilling to identify the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity?
Why are armies of journalists describing these events time after time as Nationalistic when they are actually religious in cause?

Posted by: lucien at September 8, 2004 at 09:23 PM

Spiritual leaders.

Posted by: Clem Snide at September 8, 2004 at 10:14 PM

"Malcontents." Or, one I like from the keyboards of the occasional LLL: "little brown people."

The Times could've used, "Valhalla, I did not shoot," and thus angled blame straight at the Saxons.

Posted by: ushie at September 8, 2004 at 10:18 PM

My dad calls them murderers.

Posted by: Mikey at September 8, 2004 at 10:21 PM

How about "Baby Killers"?

Sorry, that one's reserved for the US military.

Posted by: Arty at September 8, 2004 at 11:07 PM

" "By God, I did not shoot"- a translation that no other news organization has used."

I heard the same translation on UK TV - can't remember which channel.

Posted by: shay at September 8, 2004 at 11:25 PM

Interesting that ALL those news outlets can be described by a SINGLE term...

Posted by: Parker at September 9, 2004 at 12:10 AM

It's bad enough that press reports refer to the the Janaweed forces as "Arab militiamen". But, it's beyond unbelievable when UN and EU officials call these Muslim savages who have offfed half a mil black Sudanese in their "ethnic cleansing" campaign to lighten the Dafur complexion "non-genocidal".

Posted by: charlotte at September 9, 2004 at 12:26 AM

By Zeus, (Tim forgot the Greeks), "offfffed" in above post has an extra 'f' or three.

Posted by: c at September 9, 2004 at 12:29 AM

Actually, charlotte it is i believe Janajaweed not Janaweed although this might be further euphemised to GANJAweed for the Byron Bay folks.

Posted by: luke at September 9, 2004 at 12:35 AM

Thanks, luke! Pre-coffee Googling didn't help me there. I knew it was wrong, but couldn't locate that missing syllable in a minute. (S-a-v-a-g-e-s still works, though--)

Posted by: c at September 9, 2004 at 01:00 AM

...and still no mention of Fox's use of euphemisms. Nice one, Tim.

Posted by: Robert at September 9, 2004 at 01:57 AM

Absolutely, Robert, Tim needs to be "fair and balanced" in his post. Just because 98% of the MSM tries to soft-pedal the idealogical component of Islamist terrorism, Tim shouldn't overlook Fox's misdeed of euphemistically referring to Muslim terrorists as "Muslim terrorists", instead of the @#&! SOBs they are.

Posted by: c at September 9, 2004 at 02:15 AM

More suggestions:

-roguish ne'er-do-wells
-outsourced Arab workers
-disaffected youth
-"cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan" (may need to check with John Kerry for permission to use that one)

Posted by: Randal Robinson at September 9, 2004 at 02:15 AM

luke, I know it's "ideological", and now I'm off for that coffee.

Posted by: c at September 9, 2004 at 02:23 AM

I like "scamps."

Posted by: Bruce at September 9, 2004 at 03:16 AM

Oh, and "rascals" should work, too.

Posted by: Bruce at September 9, 2004 at 03:24 AM

I prefer "deranged animals" myself.

Posted by: The Real JeffS at September 9, 2004 at 04:42 AM

Rebels, eh? How about "nonconformists"?

Posted by: Harlan Pepper at September 9, 2004 at 04:56 AM

"Shit-encrusted murder monkeys?"

Posted by: Bruce at September 9, 2004 at 05:00 AM

That's Jen-jis Khan to you, Randal.

And as for my suggestion, how about "non-conformists"?

Posted by: Sean M. at September 9, 2004 at 05:22 AM

"Chomskyites"?

Or, in a nod to their historical nom de'tard,

"Moores."

Posted by: Dave S. at September 9, 2004 at 05:59 AM

Cowardly cutthroats?

Posted by: nobody important at September 9, 2004 at 06:29 AM

How bout "anybody but Bush'ers" Mike Moors' favourite.

Posted by: Dog at September 9, 2004 at 08:16 AM

I think Harvard Crimson calls them "paradigm shifters", but I can't swear to that.

Posted by: c at September 9, 2004 at 09:07 AM

Part of my post linking to yours:

Ref:CONVERTING ALLAH

Why can't the mainstream media call these vermin what they are? They are ISLAMIC TERRORISTS. ISLAMIC TERRORISTS ...

Posted by: bdfaith at September 9, 2004 at 09:34 AM

Maybe "alleged activist"?

I think "Allah" is just an Arabic word used for "God", and that Egyptian Christians sometimes use the word as well, and it is thought that Jesus Christ used a similar word as well. It's not a name like Athena or Zeus.

Did the terrorist (oops, alleged terrorist) speak in English, or was the quote translated?

Posted by: Andjam http://www.blogsforbush.com/images/rnc/erika.jpg at September 9, 2004 at 11:00 AM

allah is "god" is arabic

Posted by: John Humphreys at September 9, 2004 at 11:22 AM

Surely these "journalists" couldn't be so stupid as think that by calling terrorists anything other than terrorists any civilised reader would be fooled.Perhaps they are just attempting to show a little subtle solidarity with these murderers in case a slaughter is planned anywhere near the office buildings occupied by the would-be appeasers.This method of self preservation is more commonly known as suckholing and is invariably practiced only by suckholes.

Posted by: Lew at September 9, 2004 at 01:41 PM

...old beardy guy living in the sky...

And let's not forget - this old guy is Jewish.

Who else was brought up on Stainer's In Memorium? --

There's a Friend for little children,
Above the bright, blue sky,
A Friend who never changes,
Whose love will never die;

...and so on. So stuff that up yer jumpa, Muslims.

Posted by: Walter Plinge at September 9, 2004 at 07:38 PM

allah is "god" is arabic

From what I've read it's a contraction of "al illah", meaning "the god". Others say it means, "the greatest" - as in, "the greatest of the gods". If it is "the god" it may refer to the god of the Ka'bah (you know, that rock in Mecca that Muslims walk around) whose name, apparently, is H ubal (cf Hebrew H aBaal = the Baal). Hubal was one of a pantheon of pre-Islamic deities. His symbol was the crescent moon, he had two daughters and he was worshipped by Mohammed's father.

Those of us who aren't completely Biblically illiterate understand that God's name is YWHW, or "I AM".

"Love is to sense a need of the beloved and since Allah cannot be said to have aneed or an experience of a need, it is therefore impossible that Allah shouldlove". (cf John 3:16)
Al-Ghazzali (1058-1111)

But I'm no historian. Make of the above (which can be found here) what you will. I, for one, see no love in what the Islamist terrorists are doing.

Posted by: Janice at September 9, 2004 at 09:07 PM

Actually the tetragammon is YHWH.

Posted by: Quentin George at September 9, 2004 at 11:06 PM

Just heard on the BBC world service: those responsible for the latest terrorist attackin Jakarta were described a "disaffected groups".

And it's "Chinggis" Khan - as anyone who has spent any time in Mongolia knows.

Chinggis would know how to handle terrorists!

Posted by: Jack Linard at September 10, 2004 at 12:25 AM

Just heard on the BBC world service: those responsible for the latest terrorist attackin Jakarta were described as "disaffected groups".

And it's "Chinggis" Khan - as anyone who has spent any time in Mongolia knows.

Chinggis would know how to handle terrorists!

Posted by: Jack Linard at September 10, 2004 at 12:26 AM

Just heard on the BBC world service: those responsible for the latest terrorist attackin Jakarta were described as "disaffected groups".

And it's "Chinggis" Khan - as anyone who has spent any time in Mongolia knows.

Chinggis would know how to handle terrorists!

Posted by: Jack Linard at September 10, 2004 at 12:28 AM

I'm disappointed! Nobody called them "Protestors."

Posted by: OldHat at September 10, 2004 at 03:57 AM

Actually the tetragammon is YHWH

Actually the tetragrammaton is YHWH - or some people have it as YHVH. But I knew what you meant. Thanks for the correction.

Posted by: Janice at September 10, 2004 at 12:42 PM