May 24, 2004

SAY IT WITH PANTS

History professor Elizabeth Eve reveals the Left’s latest tactic against war and Bush and the whole hegemonic petrodollar imperial Halliburton killing machine:

Elizabeth is part of Axis of Eve, a fledgling group of rabble-rousing feminists and anti-war activists who have taken to flashing their undies as a form of political dissent.

"I was teaching a class on imperialism, and I was delivering all this material that was kind of new and upsetting, and everyone was getting all worked up and upset, and I was getting all worked up and upset, and all of a sudden, all I wanted to do was flash my underwear! It was crazy."

Yes. Yes, it was. Or, as one of Elizabeth’s pantysisters explains:

"I think sometimes verbal discourse is insufficient as a mode of expression."

So shut up already. Here are the gals at a recent protest, which looks more like some kind of "Skanks for Bush" support march. All that free advertising!

(Via Florida Cracker, who notes that "none of the Eves find Kerry sexy". Also from the Cracker: therapy dogs!)

Posted by Tim Blair at May 24, 2004 02:45 PM
Comments

so, if there were 1,150,000 ("official count") people at the "March for Women's Lives why do they only have pictures of the same skanky dozen or so? Were the others even worse?

Posted by: JorgXMcKie at May 24, 2004 at 03:08 PM

Howcum the feminists you *want* to take their clothes off never do?

And why is their trademark symbol a D-cup hottie with 1% body fat in tights?

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at May 24, 2004 at 03:34 PM

I like South Park, but while watching it I always used to be grateful that the real world wasn't that crazy.

It looks like it is though....

Posted by: gaz at May 24, 2004 at 03:34 PM

Greetings from the "Land of Imperialism" er, I mean the United States :)

I just found this site and it reminded me why I love Aussies and Oz so much. Good show!

Posted by: Matt at May 24, 2004 at 03:36 PM

Men aren't that stupid. We know that they'll keep on showing flesh (remember the naked anti-war protests) as long as Bush is in office, but will stop if Kerry is elected.

Thus the leftist inability to grasp basic incentive theory is once again demonstrated. They think you can reduce crime by disarming victims, gain peace by granting the demands of terrorist thugs, build an economy by soaking the productive to support the lazy, and elect Democrats by showing off naked and seminaked women during Republican administrations.

Posted by: Warmongering Lunatic at May 24, 2004 at 03:44 PM

Personally I would rather this bunch than a Log Cabin Republican march.

maybe thats just me, but those liberals do believ in showing Bush.

America, gotta love it.

Posted by: IXLNXS at May 24, 2004 at 03:46 PM

Great Maker, the moonbats have launched another wave to assault our senses. Literally. I preferred the "boobs not bombs" approach; at least the photos had some potential. These are just the modernized left winger version of hot pants.

God, Tim, you give us (the guys anyhow) a choice between semi-naked women and dogs. Do you know how cruel this is?

All right, then! The therapy dogs actually make a difference in the world. I'll support the dogs.

Posted by: The Real JeffS at May 24, 2004 at 03:56 PM

It's time for the Right to fight back!

We need a "Bush for Bush" campaign.

Posted by: EvilPundit at May 24, 2004 at 04:27 PM

Any chance of some panty donations to "lighten the load" of some of those aby ghraib misunderstood prisoners ?

Posted by: davo at May 24, 2004 at 04:27 PM

Looks like Bush Pigs Against Bush. Not a bad idea, either- if they need a big top style tent to hold a rally in, they can just pitch a few poles inside one of their more sizeable sister's fart-catchers, and save on the hire costs.

Posted by: Habib at May 24, 2004 at 04:53 PM

Crap-catchers For Kerry?

Posted by: Habib at May 24, 2004 at 05:06 PM

Shreddies For Socialism?

Posted by: Habib at May 24, 2004 at 05:09 PM

mmmm, as one Iranian that live in Tehran, I think radicals (e.g zionist christians and zionist lobby) took the control of U.S, and they only sacrifice american people for their radical thoughts.

Posted by: Paradoxical-Man at May 24, 2004 at 06:06 PM

Yuck. I'm off to Goldfinger's......

Posted by: Johnny Wishbone at May 24, 2004 at 06:14 PM

...meet you in the lobby.

Posted by: Theodopoulos Pherecydes at May 24, 2004 at 06:19 PM

Great Maker indeed (another B5 fan!!).

Of all the stupid, asinine ways to make a point this has to be one of the stupidest. Do they really believe all the applause, attention, and positive feedback is because of their MESSAGE?!
(Clue for the prof.: It's the FREE SHOW, stupid.)

A few quotes from the SF paper:

" ... "protest panties" which come emblazoned with anti-Dubya double-entendres like "Expose Bush," "Lick Bush," "Give Bush the Finger" and "Drill Bush Not Oil." "

" "The panties have this way of just mobilizing, energizing, inspiring," said Tasha Eve, a cultural anthropologist .. "

A cultural anthropologist SHOULD be able to figure out that the 'mobilizing, energizing, and inspiring' is NOT because people are focused on getting rid of President Bush.

It's the panties, the flashing, and the double entendres. This ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE. You'd think these women would get a clue.

Recall all the nude protests against the war. Lots of people wanted to see the protests or pictures of them because they wanted to look at nude people.

I'm not surprised that:

"Though they're willing to strip down to a string in front of a crowd of hundreds, they're not yet willing to go fully public by using their full names. "We're in this double-bind, because we're engaged in this campaign of exposure, but we can't expose ourselves," said Elizabeth. "I mean, I'm a college professor. Can you imagine what the mothers would be like? 'No, you can't teach our daughters!' " "

At least they are wise about SOME things. Although, with pictures and the Internet, I would not be at all surprised if someone posted their pictures (from a protest) and their names became known. Then we'd probably have to hear about all the 'censorship' they are being subjected to.

If these women enjoy flashing, then they should be mature enough to do so without using 'protest' as a cover.

Posted by: Chris Josephson at May 24, 2004 at 06:26 PM

The more deranged the anti-Bush protests, the better he is doing ... I hope.

Posted by: Andjam at May 24, 2004 at 06:56 PM

It would be even funnier if they did it in Iraq.

Posted by: Sue at May 24, 2004 at 09:07 PM

What the flying crap?! These people aren't protestors! They're just weirdos!

Posted by: Aaron at May 24, 2004 at 09:15 PM

"I think sometimes verbal discourse is insufficient as a mode of expression."

If you can't use your words like a big girl, then you shouldn't be involved in political discourse.

Posted by: mishu at May 24, 2004 at 09:17 PM

well said chris josephson

it's as if the bra-burning baby boomers of the sixties are continuing their antics, thinking they are still ... baby boomers of the sixties

which they are so not

Posted by: ilibcc at May 24, 2004 at 09:52 PM

Panties is ok as long as U do not make me strip nekkid and wear on my head

Posted by: Bilal at May 24, 2004 at 09:53 PM

Actually they are still baby boomers of the sixties, its just that someone forgot to tell them it's no longer the sixties
/me shakes fist... "Damn you gravity, you win again..."
*shudder*

Posted by: RhikoR at May 24, 2004 at 10:15 PM

Hey, why doesn't that babe feminist, Naomi Wolf, take a role in this? Harold Bloom would be pleased. He never did get over her lack of interest in his western canon.

Posted by: CurrencyLad at May 24, 2004 at 11:27 PM

Sadly CurrencyLad, it is an immutable law of the universe that the uglier the person, the more likely they are to get naked for no good reason.

That's why I stopped wearing clothes years ago.

Posted by: Quentin George at May 24, 2004 at 11:47 PM

I mean, I'm a college professor. Can you imagine what the mothers would be like? 'No, you can't teach our daughters!'

One wonders if it some point the parents are going to wonder why they're paying six figures for their kids to attend classes on "imperialism" in the first place...

Posted by: Otter at May 25, 2004 at 12:21 AM

I mean, I'm a college professor. Can you imagine what the mothers would be like? 'No, you can't teach our daughters!'

Well, if push ever comes to shove and she finds herself fired by the college, she's perfectly set up for her future already. "Elizabeth Eve" would make for a pretty good nom de porn, after all.

Posted by: PW at May 25, 2004 at 12:52 AM

"It would be even funnier if they did it in Iraq."

And if they did it in Saudi Arabia it would be hilarious. Love that Saudi sense of humor.

Posted by: Ernie G at May 25, 2004 at 01:16 AM

So if these bimbos are right, then Benny Hill could have been the next Karl Rove...

Paradoxical-Man — A Zionist Christian. That's like a Papist Muslim, right?

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at May 25, 2004 at 01:38 AM

There's something so wrong about linking Therapy Dogs in the same post with idiots who were just out to have a street party with panties.

Posted by: Rebecca at May 25, 2004 at 02:31 AM

"drill bush, not oil"

Now they want us to stop drilling oil altogether?! Don't these dipshits know how many of the products they use daily are made possible because of that oil?!

I am going to devote the next several years of my life developing a nuclear bomb that only destroys baby boomers...

Posted by: Oktober at May 25, 2004 at 02:43 AM

Rebecca, I found putting therapy dogs and the Street Party Idiots in the same post to be, well, therapeutic. It's good to see that the moonbats aren't all pervasive.

Posted by: The Real JeffS at May 25, 2004 at 02:43 AM

Oktober, please. I'm a Boomer, and not all of us are like that. We all were never like that. It's just that the moonbats get the free press. The rest of us have better things to do, like, well, work and family and friends and . . . you know.

Anyway, what do you want to bet most of those panties were made of material that is made from oilstock?

Posted by: JorgXMcKie at May 25, 2004 at 02:52 AM

JorgXMcKie,

I will try to add a variable to the bomb that only enables it to kill moonbat baby boomers, but, unfortunately, I can't guarantee it will work. Sorry. You may just have to take one for the team.

Posted by: Oktober at May 25, 2004 at 02:56 AM

Once again, we see evidence that the idiotarians have given up altogether on trying to make their case using logic, reason, or even language.

Once again, lefties get four-year-old tantrum behavior confused with political expression.

Once again, we get to point and laugh.

Posted by: Kimberly at May 25, 2004 at 03:08 AM

Where have all the young girls gone?
Not to the sexy knickers shop, apparently...

Posted by: Tongue Boy at May 25, 2004 at 03:16 AM

are those links "work safe"?

Posted by: Oktober at May 25, 2004 at 03:22 AM

I'm not sure if they are "eye safe".

Posted by: The Real JeffS at May 25, 2004 at 03:26 AM

P-M is there anything that the Zionists are not responsible for in your judenhaas pee-brain?

Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge at May 25, 2004 at 03:27 AM

Some girls you don't even have to think up an excuse for them to show their panties.

Posted by: papertiger at May 25, 2004 at 03:39 AM

It's time for the Right to fight back!
We need a "Bush for Bush" campaign.

This, dear EvilPundit, you will never see. If you want an easy lay you must keep attending those ANSWER rallies. :-)

Posted by: Katherine at May 25, 2004 at 04:25 AM

Katherine, but getting laid by ANSWER chicks? As my friend used to say "I wouldn't screw that skank with his (pointing to me) dick".

Posted by: David Crawford at May 25, 2004 at 05:19 AM

david

I believe the saying is: "I wouldn't fuck that bitch with a stolen dick."

Posted by: Oktober at May 25, 2004 at 05:23 AM

Some of them don't even have the courage of their convictions: what's the point of flashing panties that you are wearing on the OUTSIDE of your skin colored body suit?

Posted by: R C Dean at May 25, 2004 at 06:03 AM

In Sydney pubs the local chicks will happily show you their Brazilians, while those bush-pigs flash knickers which scream, 'hair and dags !' Take your pick.

Posted by: jafa at May 25, 2004 at 06:40 AM

"Do they really believe all the applause, attention, and positive feedback is because of their MESSAGE?!"

With application of sufficient doublethink, yes. They get to enjoy being the center of attention while pretending they're doing it for a "cause."

Posted by: ralph phelan at May 25, 2004 at 08:55 AM

At least now on those mornings I wake up without my pants I will tell people "I was protesting last night, where the hell were you? Is there any liquor left? Have you seen my pants?"

Posted by: Two in the Hat at May 25, 2004 at 09:47 AM

...all of a sudden, all I wanted to do was flash my underwear! It was crazy.

Aieeee! She has been possessed by the spirit of The Weatherwoman!

(For the benefit of the uncinematically inclined, The Weatherwoman was a Japanese film in which a young lady boosts a failing television stations ratings by flashing her knickers every night.)

Posted by: TimT at May 25, 2004 at 10:27 AM

Kerry must be thinking: "Great, more dickheads to convince the swinging voter to ignore me. Those sluts better be registered voters!"

Posted by: JakeD at May 25, 2004 at 10:39 AM

Well, it's interesting that Kerry's supporters expose themselves around the same time Alexandra Kerry flashes her tits in France. There's gotta be a conspiracy here someplace. Maybe we blame Halliburton somehow? Perhaps they supplied Alexandra's dress?

Posted by: The Real JeffS at May 25, 2004 at 12:12 PM

test post

Posted by: richard mcenroe at May 26, 2004 at 01:39 AM

Alexandra Kerry flashes her tits in France.

Plastic tits, mate. Get it right. Probably manufactured by Haliburton.

Posted by: Quentin George at May 26, 2004 at 05:31 PM

Plastic tits, you say? They're probably made from oil stolen from Iraq.

Posted by: The Real JeffS at May 27, 2004 at 12:45 AM